The diversity of multicellular organisms is, in large part, due to the fact that multicellularity has independently evolved many times. Nonetheless, multicellular organisms all share a universal biophysical trait: cells are attached to each other. All mechanisms of cellular attachment belong to one of two broad classes; intercellular bonds are either reformable or they are not. Both classes of multicellular assembly are common in nature, having independently evolved dozens of times. In this review, we detail these varied mechanisms as they exist in multicellular organisms. We also discuss the evolutionary implications of different intercellular attachment mechanisms on nascent multicellular organisms. The type of intercellular bond present during early steps in the transition to multicellularity constrains future evolutionary and biophysical dynamics for the lineage, affecting the origin of multicellular life cycles, cell–cell communication, cellular differentiation, and multicellular morphogenesis. The types of intercellular bonds used by multicellular organisms may thus result in some of the most impactful historical constraints on the evolution of multicellularity.
During the biofilm life cycle, bacteria attach to a surface and then reproduce, forming crowded, growing communities. Many theoretical models of biofilm growth dynamics have been proposed; however, difficulties in accurately measuring biofilm height across relevant time and length scales have prevented testing these models, or their biophysical underpinnings, empirically. Using white light interferometry, we measure the heights of microbial colonies with nanometer precision from inoculation to their final equilibrium height, producing a detailed empirical characterization of vertical growth dynamics. We propose a heuristic model for vertical growth dynamics based on basic biophysical processes inside a biofilm: diffusion and consumption of nutrients and growth and decay of the colony. This model captures the vertical growth dynamics from short to long time scales (10 min to 14 d) of diverse microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi.
During the evolution of multicellularity, cells undergo an evolutionary transition in individuality, such that groups become the subject of Darwinian evolution. Comparative work, supported by theory, suggests that a life cycle in which cells 'stay together' following cellular division (termed clonal development) should facilitate this transition. While central to our understanding of multicellular evolution, this hypothesis has never been directly tested in a single experimental system. We circumvent this limitation by creating an isogenic yeast system capable of either clonal or aggregative development. We evolved 20 populations of either clonally-reproducing 'snowflake' yeast or aggregative 'floc' yeast with daily selection for rapid growth followed by sedimentation, an environment where multicellularity is adaptive. While both genotypes adapted to this regime, growing faster and having higher survival during the group-selection phase, there was a stark difference in evolutionary dynamics. Competitions reveal that evolved floc obtained nearly all of their increased fitness from faster growth, not improved group survival, while snowflake yeast mainly benefited from higher group-dependent fitness. Through a combination of genome sequencing and mathematical modeling, we identify a trade-off: clonal development can allow selection to act more efficiently on group-beneficial traits, but dramatically increases the overall rate of genetic drift due to mutational bottlenecking. Our results demonstrate how simple differences in the mode of group formation can have profound impacts on the transition to multicellularity: clonal development, but not aggregation, precipitated a transition from cells to groups as the primary level of Darwinian individuality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.