The Sognefjord Formation in the Troll Field area was deposited during a general rise in sea-level during the Late Callovian to Early Volgian. A detailed study including palynology, sedimentology, response modelling and petrography of carbonate cement has been performed on 15 wells primarily from the western part of the field. All wells have been extensively cored through the reservoir enabling detailed palynological and sedimentological study of the depositional sequences in the wells. The Sognefjord Formation is interpreted, in this study, as a shoreline-attached tidally-influenced shelf complex.
The study is based on the general consistency found between the eustatic sea-level curve published by Haq
et al.
in 1987 and the biostratigraphical zonation for the Troll Field described here. The response to sea-level fluctuations in a shallow marine environment is discussed and a response model is established. A theoretical assessment of the criteria for recognizing important events is presented. The maximum flooding surfaces (mfs) and sequence boundaries (sb) are easiest to recognize. Theoretically there is a higher probability of forming carbonate cements in connection with maximum flooding surfaces.
The stratigraphically important dinocysts on Troll are classified according to their relation to sea-level fluctuations. Most of the palynozone boundaries are related to maximum flooding surfaces, except for a few which coincide with sequence boundaries. A stratigraphical subdivision of the Troll Field reservoir is presented based on a comprehensive palynological study.
Lithofacies analysis in conjunction with palynofacies interpretation have been applied to delineate the depositional environment. As an aid to the interpretation a theoretical model was established. The predicted succession and variability of sequences and facies types outlined by the theoretical model could be recognized in all wells.
Petrographical analysis shows that early diagenetic, near-surface cementation has occurred in connection with maximum flooding surfaces and sequence boundaries on Troll.
With the help of the stratigraphical framework the presence or absence of sequence boundaries, transgressive systems tracts, maximum flooding surfaces, and highstand systems tracts in each cycle has been defined in each well. This has given the detailed geometry of the reservoir sands of the field, and also allowed correlation of carbonate cemented horizons which are associated with bounding surfaces of the systems tracts. Knowledge of the distribution and extent of these cemented horizons has considerable significance for oil production strategy, particularly the siting of horizontal wells.
Pore-fluid pressure gradients in Lower Tertiary to Upper Jurassic mudrocks in the Gullfaks area show significant variations, both between and within individual structural compartments. Detection and quantification of abnormal pore-pressures, based on drilling parameters and wire line logs, are significantly influenced by petrological variations in the mudrocks and do not provide adequate direct pressure indicators. Empirical models show that the degree of overpressuring in mudrocks above the Gullfaks reservoirs cannot be fully explained by processes such as shale dehydration, compaction disequilibrium, aquathermal effects or in situ hydrocarbon generation, and other processes, such as caprock failure and subsequent migration of hydrocarbons (mainly gas) into the overlying mudrocks, appear to be influential in generating the observed pattern of overpressure.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. Abstract This paper summarizes the findings of the SPE Forum held in September 2005 on "Making our Mature Fields Smarter".
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.