Objective
To compare frontal plane knee moments, and kinematics and kinetics
associated with knee valgus moments between cutting to 45° and
110°, and to determine the predictive value of kinematics and ground
reaction forces (GRFs) on knee valgus moments when cutting to these angles.
Also, to determine whether sex differences exist in kinematics and kinetics
when cutting to 45° and 110°.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Laboratory setting.
Participants
Forty five (20 females) healthy young adult soccer athletes ages
16-23 years.
Assessment of Risk Factors
Kinematic and kinetic variables were compared between randomly-cued
side-step cutting maneuvers to 45° and 110°. Predictors of
knee valgus moment were determined for each task.
Main Outcome Measures
Kinematic variables: knee valgus angle, hip abduction and internal
rotation angles. Kinetic variables: vertical, posterior, and lateral GRFs,
and knee valgus moment.
Results
Knee valgus moments were greater when cutting to 110° compared
to 45°, and females exhibited greater moments than males. Vertical
and lateral GRFs, hip internal rotation angle, and knee valgus angle
explained 63% of the variance in knee valgus moment during cutting to
45°. During cutting to 110°, posterior GRF, hip internal
rotation angle, and knee valgus angle explained 41% of the variance in knee
valgus moment.
Conclusion
Cutting tasks with larger redirection demands result in greater knee
valgus moments. Similar factors including shear GRFs, hip internal rotation
and knee valgus position contribute to knee valgus loading during cuts
performed to smaller (45°) and larger (110°) angles.
These relations have important implications for ACL injury prevention programs. Although restricting frontal and transverse plane movement has been emphasized in many programs, these movement recommendations may not be appropriate for cutting tasks performed at greater angles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.