Background: Eliminating animal testing for skin sensitization is a significant challenge in consumer safety risk assessment. To be able to perform resilient risk assessments in the future, one will need alternative approaches to fill the data gaps.
Regulatory recommendations for providing bioanalytical support for biological therapeutics have co-evolved with the increasing success of these unique pharmaceuticals. Immunoassays have been used to quantify biological macromolecules for more than 50 years. These assays rely on the use of antigen-specific antibodies. More recently, LC-MS methods have being adapted to quantitate biologics. LC-MS has attributes that complement the limitations encountered by immunoassays. Whether employing immunoassay or LC-MS methods, compared with traditional chemical-based therapeutics, biological therapeutics present unique analytical challenges to analysts. In this article, we review bioanalytical strategies for supporting biologics and discuss the regulatory and analytical challenges that must be met.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.