Among all randomly assigned patients (with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy), the percentage of patients who had a response at 6 months did not differ significantly between the migalastat group and the placebo group. (Funded by Amicus Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00925301 [study AT1001-011] and NCT01458119 [study AT1001-041].).

BackgroundFabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), stabilises specific mutant (amenable) forms of α-Gal to facilitate normal lysosomal trafficking.MethodsThe main objective of the 18-month, randomised, active-controlled ATTRACT study was to assess the effects of migalastat on renal function in patients with Fabry disease previously treated with ERT. Effects on heart, disease substrate, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were also assessed.ResultsFifty-seven adults (56% female) receiving ERT (88% had multiorgan disease) were randomised (1.5:1), based on a preliminary cell-based assay of responsiveness to migalastat, to receive 18 months open-label migalastat or remain on ERT. Four patients had non-amenable mutant forms of α-Gal based on the validated cell-based assay conducted after treatment initiation and were excluded from primary efficacy analyses only. Migalastat and ERT had similar effects on renal function. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly with migalastat treatment (−6.6 g/m2 (−11.0 to −2.2)); there was no significant change with ERT. Predefined renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% and 44% of patients in the migalastat and ERT groups, respectively. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine remained low and stable following the switch from ERT to migalastat. PROs were comparable between groups. Migalastat was generally safe and well tolerated.ConclusionsMigalastat offers promise as a first-in-class oral monotherapy alternative treatment to intravenous ERT for patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations.Trial registration number:NCT00925301; Pre-results.

The Fabry Registry is a global observational research platform established to define outcome data on the natural and treated course of this rare disorder. Participating physicians submit structured longitudinal data to a centralized, confidential database. This report describes the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the first 1765 patients (54% males (16% aged < 20 years) and 46% females (13% < 20 years)) enrolled in the Fabry Registry. The median ages at symptom onset and diagnosis were 9 and 23 years (males) and 13 and 32 years (females), respectively, indicating diagnostic delays in both sexes. Frequent presenting symptoms in males included neurological pain (62%), skin signs (31%), gastroenterological symptoms (19%), renal signs (unspecified) (17%), and ophthalmological signs (11%). First symptoms in females included neurological pain (41%), gastroenterological symptoms (13%), ophthalmological (12%), and skin signs (12%). For those patients reporting renal progression, the median age at occurrence was 38 years for both sexes, but onset of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events was later in females (median 43 and 47 years, respectively) than in males (38 and 41 years, respectively). This paper demonstrates that in spite of the considerable burden of disease in both sexes that begins to manifest in childhood or adolescence, the recognition of the underlying diagnosis is delayed by 14 years in males and 19 years in females. The Fabry Registry provides data that can increase awareness of common symptoms in all age groups, as well as insight into treated and untreated disease course, leading to improved recognition and earlier treatment, and possibly to improved outcomes for affected individuals.

Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation modulator, versus placebo for the treatment of active class III or IV lupus nephritis, when used on a background of mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids.Methods. This was a 12-month, randomized, phase II/III, multicenter, international, double-blind study. A total of 298 patients were treated in 1 of 3 IV treatment arms: placebo, abatacept at the standard weight-tiered dose (approximating 10 mg/kg), or abatacept at 30 mg/kg for 3 months, followed by the standard weight-tiered dose (abatacept 30/10). The primary end point, time to confirmed complete response, was a composite measure that required maintenance of glomerular filtration rate, minimal proteinuria, and inactive urinary sediment over the 52-week treatment period.Results. There were no differences among treatment arms in the time to confirmed complete response or in the proportion of subjects with confirmed complete response following 52 weeks of treatment. Treatment with abatacept was associated with greater improvements from baseline in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, C3, and C4 levels. Among 122 patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria, treatment with abatacept resulted in an ϳ20-30% greater reduction in mean urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio compared with placebo. Abatacept was well tolerated; rates of deaths, serious adverse events, and serious infections were similar across treatment arms. Gastroenteritis and herpes zoster occurred more frequently with abatacept treatment.Conclusion. Although the primary end point was not met, abatacept showed evidence of biologic activity and was well tolerated in patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis.Lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by the activation and persistence of autoreactive T and B cells and the presence of potentially pathogenic autoantibodies (1). Abatacept is a fusion protein comprising ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00430677.