Attitudinal and instrumental barriers exist for couples broadly that prevent couples from accessing professional relationship help. These barriers may be even more pronounced among couples from low-income, and other underserved, backgrounds. The current study examined how couples’ (N = 651 couples) presenting attitudes toward seeking couple treatment, and change in these attitudes, differed as a function of demographic variables within a brief relationship education program, Relationship Checkup (Gordon et al., 2020). Results revealed that individuals who identified as male, a person of color, had lower income, or were cohabiting evidenced poorer baseline attitudes relative to their demographic counterparts. Further, people of color and people who were cohabiting evidenced greater change in attitudes across the intervention relative to their demographic counterparts. Thus, clinicians may benefit from considering that underserved couples appear to face attitudinal barriers in addition to known instrumental barriers (e.g., financial, transportation, childcare, time, etc.). Clinical and research implications are discussed.
This is a single-case study of a middle-aged man presenting with relationship distress and simultaneous major depressive disorder with chronic back pain and a physical tic. Treatment was informed by cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and psychodynamic principles. Over the course of treatment, a variety of techniques were utilized, including progressive muscle relaxation training, behavioral monitoring, cognitive restructuring, and interpersonal principles to address somatic complaints and underlying feelings of helplessness and inadequacy. Symptoms including general distress, frustration, back pain, worry about his wife's mental illness, and amount of negative thinking were tracked on a daily basis over three assessment periods. In addition, clinically significant change was assessed using a comparison of baseline and follow-up results from the patient's Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45.2). Evidence for symptomatic and characterological change is outlined, and treatment implications are discussed. Keywords case study, integrative treatment, time series, major depressive disorder, chronic pain 1 Theoretical and Research Basis for Treatment Many individuals seek psychological treatment with a number of complaints that may seem unrelated. It is often the work of therapy to understand how and why disparate symptoms occur simultaneously. The following case study is an example of conducting therapy with an individual who reported several areas of concern but denied intense suffering from any one area. In this case, the initial, seemingly unrelated problems were depression, relationship distress, back pain, and eyebrow rubbing. This article first outlines the theory and research behind several treatment approaches used in an integrative fashion at the beginning of therapy. Then, we discuss changes to the original treatment plan, results from outcome data, as well as an integrative formulation that might link these seemingly distinct presenting complaints.
No abstract
No abstract
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.