No abstract

This study explores the managerial perspectives towards open source software and networked innovation. We analysed six software companies who use open source software as a significant part of their product or service offering. The study found notable differences in managerial attitudes, expected benefits and key challenges related to open source software and its role in innovative activities. While all companies were using same pieces of software with open source communities, there were different levels of engagement in the development of the software and information flows between companies and communities. A deeper level of involvement enables the exchange of more than just the code: like ideas, influences, opinions and even innovations or parts of them. The differences in managerial views on open source and networked innovation may be explained by industry domains, value chain position and leadership styl

Software systems are composed of components acquired from different sources, e.g. subcontractors, component providers, and open source software providers. Therefore, integrability is one of the most important qualities in software development. Extensibility is especially important in open source software systems because they evolve according to the needs of the user community and often into a direction not originally foreseen. Integrability evaluation refers to testing if separately developed components work correctly together. Extensibility evaluation focuses on how new features, originated from customers' demands or new emerging technologies, could easily be developed and exploited in systems without losing existing capabilities. The impact of changes to the system also has to be estimated. This can be done by a method called IEE, which enables extensibility and integrability evaluation from software architectural models. The contribution of this paper is to introduce the IEE method and illustrate how it is to be used with a real world case study. In the case study, we applied the IEE in evaluating the architecture of an existing open source tool. Evaluation revealed a need to introduce two new extension points to the architecture and also that an integration framework is needed to integrate the tool under evaluation with other supporting tools.

No abstract

No abstract