Changing climatic conditions and unsustainable land use are major threats to savannas worldwide. Historically, many African savannas were used intensively for livestock grazing, which contributed to widespread patterns of bush encroachment across savanna systems. To reverse bush encroachment, it has been proposed to change the cattle‐dominated land use to one dominated by comparatively specialized browsers and usually native herbivores. However, the consequences for ecosystem properties and processes remain largely unclear. We used the ecohydrological, spatially explicit model EcoHyD to assess the impacts of two contrasting, herbivore land‐use strategies on a Namibian savanna: grazer‐ versus browser‐dominated herbivore communities. We varied the densities of grazers and browsers and determined the resulting composition and diversity of the plant community, total vegetation cover, soil moisture, and water use by plants. Our results showed that plant types that are less palatable to herbivores were best adapted to grazing or browsing animals in all simulated densities. Also, plant types that had a competitive advantage under limited water availability were among the dominant ones irrespective of land‐use scenario. Overall, the results were in line with our expectations: under high grazer densities, we found heavy bush encroachment and the loss of the perennial grass matrix. Importantly, regardless of the density of browsers, grass cover and plant functional diversity were significantly higher in browsing scenarios. Browsing herbivores increased grass cover, and the higher total cover in turn improved water uptake by plants overall. We concluded that, in contrast to grazing‐dominated land‐use strategies, land‐use strategies dominated by browsing herbivores, even at high herbivore densities, sustain diverse vegetation communities with high cover of perennial grasses, resulting in lower erosion risk and bolstering ecosystem services.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Changing climatic conditions and unsustainable land use are perceived as
major threats to savannas worldwide. In the past, land use in African
savannas was dominated by livestock-farming as one of the major economic
products, which led to degraded, shrub encroached pastures in many
regions. One response to this widespread degradation is a shift from
land use dominated by cattle to strategies characterized by animal
compositions with more mixed feeding regimes and higher browser
proportions. However, the consequences for ecosystem properties and
processes remain so far largely unclear. We used the ecohydrological,
spatially explicit savanna model EcoHyD to assess the impacts of two
contrasting, herbivore-related land use strategies on a Namibian
savannah: grazing versus browsing herbivores. We varied the densities of
grazers and browsers and determined the resulting composition and
diversity of the plant community, total vegetation cover, soil moisture
and water use by plants. Our results show that properties making plants
less attractive to herbivores were best adapted to different densities
of grazing (cattle) or browsing (pure browsing wildlife) animals. Also,
properties leading to a competitive advantage under limited water
availability were among the dominant ones. Overall, the results are in
line with our expectations: we found heavy shrub encroachment with a
loss of the perennial grass matrix under high stocking rates of cattle.
A novel and unexpected result was that regardless of the density of
browsers, grass cover and plant functional diversity were significantly
higher in wildlife scenarios. This increased grass cover, but also the
higher total cover improved water uptake by plants. We conclude that in
contrast to grazers, browsers even in high densities do not lead to
ecosystem degradation, but rather sustain a diverse vegetation with high
cover of perennial grasses over a long time, implying also a lower
erosion risk and higher provision of ecosystem services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.