PC chemotherapy is effective in GC. With the NOA-05 trial being the first prospective multicenter trial in GC, PC chemotherapy can be regarded as a promising option for the primary therapy of these tumors.
Objectives: In this study, we analyzed the prognostic value of different MRI progression patterns for survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab. Patients and Methods: Twenty-six adult patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab or bevacizumab/irinotecan were retrospectively analyzed for the development of contrast-enhanced (T1-weighted MRI) and T2/FLAIR lesions. According to the progression pattern, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: (1) patients with primarily progressive contrast-enhanced lesions in the first MRI after initiation of therapy (‘primary PD group'); (2) patients with stable or regressive enhanced lesions but progressive FLAIR lesions (‘FLAIR-only PD group'), and (3) patients with stable or regressive contrast-enhanced T1 and FLAIR lesions (‘no PD group'). Results: Overall survival (OS) in the 6 patients in the FLAIR-only PD group was not significantly different from the 11 patients in the no PD group (median 311 vs. 254 days, respectively). In contrast, survival in the FLAIR-only PD group was significantly better (p = 0.025) than in the primary PD group. Conclusion: FLAIR-only progression is not an independent prognostic factor negatively influencing OS in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and should not lead to discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy.
Background: In a previous trial (NOA-01), the combination of nimustine and teniposide showed efficacy in previously untreated glioblastoma (GBM). After establishing temozolomide as standard first-line therapy in GBM patients, the nimustine (ACNU)/teniposide (VM-26) combination has been employed as salvage chemotherapy for recurrent GBM. However, data on the toxicity and efficacy of this regimen in recurrent GBM are lacking. Patients and Methods: In two neurooncological centers, all patients with recurrent GBM treated with nimustine (90 mg/m2, day 1/42) and teniposide (45–70 mg/m2, days 1–3/42) were analyzed retrospectively for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: Thirty-five patients (median age 51 years, range 25–71 years) were identified. Six months after chemotherapy initiation, PFS was 29% and the median OS 6 months; 23% of patients were alive ≥1 year after initiation of nimustine-teniposide chemotherapy. Grade 4 hematotoxicity was observed in 12 of 35 patients (34%) and in 14 of 83 evaluable chemotherapy courses (17%). Conclusions: The benefit of the nimustine-teniposide combination is moderate in patients with recurrent GBM. The data support the efficacy of the nimustine-teniposide chemotherapy, but the rate of high-grade hematotoxicity is increased.
Background: Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is a diffuse infiltrating glial tumor with involvement of at least 3 cerebral lobes. There are only few data on the efficacy of initial chemotherapy in patients with GC. Patients and Methods: In 3 neurooncological centers, patients with newly diagnosed GC who had received procarbazine (60 mg/m2, days 8–21/56) and CCNU (110 mg/m2, day 1/56) chemotherapy (PC) as initial treatment were analyzed for progression-free survival, overall survival and toxicity. Results: Twelve patients (median age 46 years, range 27–72) were analyzed. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 16 and 37 months. Grade 3 or 4 hematotoxicity was observed in 3 of 12 patients (25%). Conclusions: These data support the efficacy of PC chemotherapy in newly diagnosed GC. Initial PC chemotherapy should be considered as a treatment option and evaluated in larger clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.