Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes can be accomplished rapidly after implementing a fast-track colonic surgery project at a university-affiliated general teaching hospital. Methods: In 2004 and 2005 all colonic surgery patients were recorded for a number of pre-, per- and postoperative care elements. In 2006, during the implementation of a fast-track program, changes were recorded. Results: Before the implementation of the fast-track regime at our hospital, 97% of the patients (n = 89/92) received mechanical bowel preparation, in contrast to 3% (n = 1/36) afterwards (p < 0.0001). The application of thoracic epidural analgesia rose from 46% (n = 42/92) in 2004 and 2005 to 94% (n = 34/36) in 2006 (p < 0.0001). The use of nasogastric tubes postoperatively almost disappeared. 77% (n = 28/36) enjoyed a small meal on the 1st day after operation, compared to 0% (n = 0/92) in 2004 and 2005 (p < 0.0001). Median hospital stay was 6 (range 3–27) nights in 2006 compared to 9 (range 3–25) nights in 2005 and 9.5 (range 7–64) nights in 2004 (p < 0.005). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that also at a district general teaching hospital advantages can be reached rapidly and safely by implementing fast-track surgery; especially a faster recovery.

No abstract

Background Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE. Methods The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid. Results The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri‐tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow‐up to be currently proposed in this indication. Conclusion These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care. Significance Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE.

No abstract

Intra-operative or late leakage of colorectal anastomosis can be safely treated by transanal laparoscopy. This new transanal platform offers the surgeon the possibility to work in ergonomic positions, without increasing the cost of the procedure thanks to the reusable nature of the material used.