To automate diagnostic chest radiograph imaging quality control (lung inclusion at all four edges, patient rotation, and correct inspiration) using convolutional neural network models. Methods: The data comprised of 2589 postero-anterior chest radiographs imaged in a standing position, which were divided into train, validation, and test sets. We increased the number of images for the inclusion by cropping appropriate images, and for the inclusion and the rotation by flipping the images horizontally. The image histograms were equalized, and the images were resized to a 512 × 512 resolution. We trained six convolutional neural networks models to detect the image quality features using manual image annotations as training targets. Additionally, we studied the inter-observer variability of the image annotation. Results: The convolutional neural networks' areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were >0.88 for the inclusions, and >0.70 and >0.79 for the rotation and the inspiration, respectively. The inter-observer agreement between two human annotators for the assessed image-quality features were: 92%, 90%, 82%, and 88% for the inclusion at patient's left, patient's right, cranial, and caudal edges, and 78% and 89% for the rotation and inspiration, respectively. Higher inter-observer agreement was related to a smaller variance in the network confidence. Conclusions: The developed models provide automated tools for the quality control in a radiological department. Additionally, the convolutional neural networks could be used to obtain immediate feedback of the chest radiograph image quality, which could serve as an educational instrument.

Objective We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. Materials and methods We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. Results With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors' distortion correction on or off, respectively. Discussion Using nonrigid CT-MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra-and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions.