Physical activity after a hip fracture : effect of a multicomponent home-based rehabilitation program -a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Turunen, Katri; Salpakoski, Anu; Edgren, Johanna; Törmäkangas, Timo; Arkela, Marja; Kallinen, Mauri; Pesola, Maija; Hartikainen, Sirpa; Nikander, Riku; Sipilä, Sarianna Turunen, K., Salpakoski, A., Edgren, J., Törmäkangas, T., Arkela, M., Kallinen, M., . . . Sipilä, S. (2017). Physical activity after a hip fracture : effect of a multicomponent home-based rehabilitation program -a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98 (5), 981-988. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe thank the physiotherapists at the Central Finland Health Care District for the valuable work in the recruitment of the participants and data collection. We are also thankful to all those persons who assisted in data collection. follow-up among older people recovering from a recent hip fracture. M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT7 DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.8 SETTING: Home-based rehabilitation; measurements in university laboratory.9 PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling people aged 60+ recovering from a hip fracture. 10Participants were randomly assigned into an intervention (n=40) or control (n=41) group on 11 average 42±23 days after discharge from hospital. 12 MEASUREMENTS:The outcome was the level of PA, which was assessed with the 13 questionnaire (a modified Grimby scale) at baseline, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after baseline.14 Three PA categories were defined: inactivity, light PA and moderate to heavy PA. Physical increased PA among older hip fracture patients. The increase was found to be maintained at the 26 one-year follow-up.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of multicomponent rehabilitation on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and mobility in older people recently discharged from hospital. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Home and community. Participants: Community-dwelling people aged ⩾60 years recovering from a lower limb or back musculoskeletal injury, surgery, or disorder were recruited from local health center hospitals and randomly assigned into an intervention ( n = 59) or a control (standard care, n = 58) group. Intervention: The six-month intervention consisted of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program, physical activity counseling, and standard care. Measurements: Physical activity and sedentary time were assessed using an accelerometer and a single question. Mobility was evaluated with the Short Physical Performance Battery, self-reported use of a walking aid, and ability to negotiate stairs and walk outdoors. Intervention effects were analyzed with generalized estimating equations. Results: Daily physical activity was 127 ± 78 minutes/day and 121 ± 70 at baseline and 167 ± 81 and 164 ± 72 at six months in the intervention and control group, respectively; mean difference of 3.4 minutes (95% confidence interval (CI) = −20.3 to 27.1). In addition, no significant between-group differences were shown in physical performance. Conclusion: The rehabilitation program was not superior to standard care for increasing physical activity or improving physical performance. Mobility-limited older people who had recently returned home from hospital would have needed a longer and more frequently monitored comprehensive geriatric intervention.

BackgroundPhysical activity (PA) decreases during hospitalization. In particular, the amount of PA engaged in by older people who are hospitalized following musculoskeletal injury is likely to be limited for months after discharge home. Given the importance of an active lifestyle for their recovery and the prevention of future adverse outcomes, there is clearly a need for interventions to increase PA. This article describes the protocol of a randomized controlled trial set up to investigate the effects of a physical activity oriented home rehabilitation program (ProPA) on PA and the restoration of mobility in community-dwelling older people.MethodsMen and women aged 60 years or older hospitalized due to a musculoskeletal injury or disorder in the back or lower limbs are recruited. After discharge from hospital to home, participants are randomized into a six-month ProPA program or a standard care (control) group. The ProPA program consists of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program and physical activity counseling. In addition, frail participants who are not able to go outdoors alone receive support from volunteers.Primary outcomes are PA measured using a 3-dimentional accelerometer, and mobility assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery and self-reports. Secondary outcomes are life space mobility, participation restriction, fear of falling, pain, mood, and grip strength. Information on barriers to and enablers of PA participation are also collected. Data on mortality and use of health services are collected from the national register. In this 6-month intervention, all participants are assessed in their homes at baseline and after three and six months, and at 12 months after randomization they will receive a follow-up questionnaire.DiscussionThis study investigates the effects of a rehabilitation program on PA and mobility among older people at risk for increased sedentary time and mobility problems. If positive effects are observed, the program can be considered for incorporation into the health care system and thereby contribute to the rehabilitation of older people who have recently been discharged from hospital.Trial registration ISRCTN13461584. Registered 27 January 2016.

Objective: To examine whether pre-admission community mobility explains the effects of a rehabilitation program on physical performance and activity in older adults recently discharged from hospital. Design: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Home and community. Participants: Community-dwelling adults aged ⩾60 years recovering from a lower limb or back injury, surgery or other disorder who were randomized to a rehabilitation ( n = 59) or standard care control ( n = 58) group. They were further classified into subgroups that were not planned a priori: (1) mild, (2) moderate, or (3) severe pre-admission restrictions in community mobility. Interventions: The 6-month intervention consisted of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program, physical activity counselling, and standard care. Measurements: Physical performance was measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery and physical activity with accelerometers and self-reports. Data were analysed by generalized estimating equation models with the interactions of intervention, time, and subgroup. Results: Rehabilitation improved physical performance more in the intervention ( n = 30) than in the control group ( n = 28) among participants with moderate mobility restriction: score of the Short Physical Performance Battery was 4.4 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 2.2 at baseline, and 7.3 ± 2.6 and 5.8 ± 2.9 at 6 months in the intervention and control group, respectively (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 3.1). Rehabilitation did not increase accelerometer-based physical activity in the aforementioned subgroup and did not benefit those with either mild or severe mobility restrictions. Conclusions: Pre-admission mobility may determine the response to the largely counselling-based rehabilitation program.

Objectives: Neuroticism predicts falls in older people. In addition, concern about falling and depressive symptoms are associated with fall risk. This study examined whether concern about falling and depressive symptoms mediate the association between neuroticism and falls.Method: Cross-sectional data on 314 community-dwelling people aged 70-85 years were utilized. Neuroticism was assessed with a short modified form of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Indoor and outdoor falls during the past year were self-reported. Concern about falling was assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International and depressive symptoms with the Geriatric Depression Scale-15. Path modeling was used to examine the associations between variables.Results: Mediating pathways linking neuroticism and falls were found: neuroticism was positively associated with concern about falling, which was subsequently linked to indoor falls (indirect effect β=0.34, P=0.002) and recurrent outdoor falls (β=0.19, P=0.045).Moreover, a pathway from neuroticism to indoor falls through depressive symptoms was also found (β=0.21, P=0.054). In other words, higher neuroticism was associated with higher concern about falling and depressive symptoms, both of which were linked to falls. The associations were independent of age, sex, use of psychotropic, chronic diseases, persistent pain, physical performance, physical activity, and executive functioning that are known risk factors for falls.Discussion: The results indicate that concern about falling and depressive symptoms mediate the association between neuroticism and falling. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the causality of the findings and to examine the potential to reduce falls by targeting concern about falling and depressive symptoms among older adults higher in neuroticism.