Good glycaemic control can be achieved with both G+MET and NPH+MET. Use of G+MET reduces symptomatic hypoglycaemia during the first 12 weeks and dinner time hyperglycaemia compared with NPH+MET.
Despite a good initial response to insulin therapy in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, long-term treatment results are often less satisfactory [1]. The poor treatment results have been attributed to the progressive nature of Type II diabetes and to failure to increase the insulin dose sufficiently to overcome insulin resistance induced by weight gain [2,3]. Previous data on the causes of weight gain during insulin therapy in patients with Type II diabetes are sparse. In one study the basal metabolic rate (BMR) was measured before and after 1 year of insulin therapy in eight patients with Type II diabetes, whose weight increased by 3.9 kg, HbA 1 c decreased by 1.7 % and absolute BMR (kJ/ min) remained unchanged [4]. BMR also remained unchanged in a study of six patients treated for 2 weeks with glyburide and insulin [5]. Glucosuria or dietary intake were not determined in these studies. Another previous study found body weight to increase by 2.1 kg during combination therapy with sulfonylurea and bedtime insulin and attributed this increase to a reduction in glucosuria but data on BMR or dietary intake were not reported [6]. Diabetologia (1999) 2 ) were treated with insulin alone (n = 13) or insulin and with metformin (n = 13). Components of energy balance (basal metabolic rate, energy intake, glucosuria) were measured at 0 and 12 months. Results. Glycaemic control improved similarly in patients using (HbA 1 c 10.5 ± 0.3 vs 7.6 ± 0.2 %, p < 0.001) and not using (10.2 ± 0.3 vs 7.8 ± 0.3 %, p < 0.001) metformin. The metformin group required 47 % less insulin than the group not using metformin (p < 0.001). Body weight increased by 3.8 ± 0.8 and 7.5 ± 1.6 kg (p < 0.05), respectively. Basal metabolic rate and glucosuria were similar at 0 and 12 months in both groups but the metformin group decreased energy intake by 1.12 ± 0.46 MJ/day, whereas it remained unchanged in the other group (0.15 ± 0.42 MJ/day). Changes in body weight and glycaemia were statistically significant independent determinants of basal metabolic rate. Their change in opposite directions explained why basal metabolic rate remained unchanged. Conclusion/interpretation. Improved glycaemia promotes weight gain by decreasing both basal metabolic rate and glucosuria. Use of metformin decreases weight gain by reducing energy intake and is therefore a useful adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with Type II diabetes. [Diabetologia (1999)
Serum levels of cholesterol precursors (squalene, delta 8-cholestanol, desmosterol and lathosterol), plant sterols (campesterol and sitosterol), cholestanol and cholestanol/noncholesterol sterol ratios were related to liver damage and liver transplantation indications in healthy controls (n = 26) and in 31 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis divided into group I (S-bilirubin less than 21 mumol/L; n = 14), group II (S-bilirubin 21 to 108 mumol/L; n = 7) and group III (elected for liver transplantation; S-bilirubin 109 to 520 mumol/L; n = 10). The mean serum respective lathosterol levels in controls and in group I were three and two times higher than those in groups II and III, respectively. The plant sterol contents were higher in group II than in groups I and III and the campesterol/sitosterol ratios were lowest in group III. The serum cholestanol levels were high even in group I (i.e., in patients without icterus) and increased progressively to group III, up to 6 and 13 times those in group I and the control group, respectively. The cholestanol/noncholesterol sterol ratios increased progressively from the controls to groups I, II and III. The serum cholestanol levels were positively related to serum bilirubin levels in all primary biliary cirrhosis patients (n = 31, r = 0.906) and to the plant sterol levels in the control group and group I, but significantly negatively in group III. The cholestanol vs. precursor sterol correlations were negative in most cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Serum noncholesterol sterols indicate overall cholesterol metabolism in a variety of experimental and clinical conditions. In patients with advanced primary biliary cirrhosis serum cholestanol, a 5 alpha-derivative of cholesterol, is markedly increased, and cholesterol precursors, which are indicators of cholesterol synthesis, are clearly reduced, as is the ratio of plant sterols (campesterol/sitosterol). Therefore these variables were studied in the livers and sera of 23 patients undergoing liver transplantation (16 patients with chronic liver disease, 4 with acute liver failure and 3 receiving second liver) and in 10 healthy controls. A most striking finding was the markedly high liver and serum levels of cholestanol in patients with chronic end-stage liver disease, a finding specific for cholestanol but not for other sterols. Of the cholesterol precursor sterols, lathosterol exhibited low contents in both the serum and liver of the cirrhotic patient group, supposedly reflecting decreased cholesterol synthesis. In contrast to the largely similar levels of noncholesterol sterols in serum and liver and the positive correlations between the two sources, the serum squalene levels were markedly lower than the hepatic levels, with a negative correlation between the serum and the liver, suggesting that serum squalene content poorly reflects cholesterol synthesis. In contrast to campesterol, serum and liver sitosterol tended to show increases, and the serum and hepatic campesterol/sitosterol ratios were lower in the chronic liver disease patients than in the controls, probably because of the more consistently impaired biliary elimination of sitosterol in those patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.