Sleep disturbances in early childhood are associated with mood and anxiety disorders. Children also exhibit sleep disruptions, such as nighttime awakenings, nightmares, and difficulties falling asleep, in conjunction with adverse events and stress. Prior studies have examined independently the role of sleep on adaptive processing, as well as the effects of stress on sleep. However, how childhood sleep and children's adaptive behavior (i.e., coping strategies) bidirectionally interact is currently less known. Using a within-subjects design and actigraphy-measured sleep from 16 preschool-aged children (Mage = 56.4 months, SD = 10.8, range: 36–70 months), this study investigated how prior sleep patterns relate to children's coping during a potentially stressful event, the COVID-19 pandemic, and how prior coping skills may influence children's sleep during the pandemic. Children who woke earlier had greater negative expression both before and during the pandemic. During the pandemic, children slept longer and woke later on average compared to before the pandemic. Additionally, for children engaged in at-home learning, sleeping longer was associated with less negative expression. These findings highlight how sleep behaviors and coping strategies are related, and the stability of this relationship under stress.
Although some studies indicate physical activity and sleep quality are positively associated in children, most reports examined physical activity independent of other 24-h behaviors and focused on older children. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the predicted changes in sleep efficiency and habits when reallocating time between movement behaviors using compositional isotemporal substitution in preschool-aged children. Accelerometers were worn by 288 participants (51.6 ± 9.5 months) for up to 16 days. Sleep outcomes included sleep efficiency, nap frequency, sleep disturbances, and bedtime resistance. Compositional isotemporal substitution analyses demonstrated that the combined effect of 24-h movement behaviors was associated with sleep efficiency (p < 0.001) and nap frequency (p < 0.003). When sleep increased by 30 min at the expense of stationary time or light physical activity, estimates of sleep efficiency and bedtime resistance decreased while nap frequency increased. When stationary time increased by 30 min from moderate to vigorous physical activity, estimated sleep efficiency increased and sleep disturbances decreased. Although this study presents preliminary evidence that 24-h movement behavior compositions in early childhood are associated with sleep quality and nap frequency, estimated effects from theoretical time reallocations across sleep outcomes were mixed.
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the associations between physical activity and sleep in children aged less than 6 years. Articles were included if participants were primarily aged less than 6 years and study designs were observational or experimental. Study characteristics were extracted, and the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess study quality. Thirty-six studies (16 sleep, 16 physical activity, and three fitness outcomes) from 18 countries reported in 29 articles were included. The majority of sleep and physical activity outcome studies reported mixed effects with very low to low quality of evidence. Fitness outcome studies were limited, and therefore, evidence was insufficient. The high prevalence of mixed and null results could be related to study limitations. Importantly, this review points to the critical need for higher quality studies of sleep and physical activity in young children, which would support health recommendations and intervention strategies for healthier child development.
Introduction Circadian amplitude measures the strength or robustness of a rhythm and changes in amplitude may have implications for health. Large individual differences in melatonin amplitude are recognized. Here we aimed to determine the strength of relationships between melatonin and the core body (CBT) and distal-proximal skin temperature gradient (DPG) amplitudes during a constant routine protocol. Additionally, we determined the best fitting harmonic model for the DPG circadian rhythm. Methods 17 young healthy adults [13 males (22.3±3.9yr;mean±SD)] completed a 28-hr constant routine protocol after maintaining 8h habitual sleep schedules for one week at home. Endogenous circadian amplitudes of melatonin and CBT were fit with standard three- and dual-harmonic linear regression models, respectively. The DPG amplitude was analyzed with both dual and three-harmonic regression models to determine which model produced the best fit. Results The DPG was best fit by a three-harmonic regression model with significantly lower standard deviation and higher signal-to-noise ratio compared to the 2-harmonic model (both p<0.05) as well as by visualization of the fitted curves. Melatonin, CBT and DPG amplitudes were not found to be associated with each other during constant routine (all r<0.37; all p>0.10). Conclusion While it is common for melatonin and body temperature circadian phase estimates to be used interchangeably, non-significant findings for associations between circadian amplitudes of melatonin, CBT and DPG indicate that these markers may not provide similar information about circadian amplitude. Further, research is needed to explore possible associations between individual differences in melatonin, CBT and DPG amplitudes with other physiological and behavioral outcomes to determine which measure(s) of circadian amplitude may be functionally relevant. Support (if any) NIH R01 HL081761
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.