Background and objectives X-linked Alport syndrome is caused by mutations in the COL4A5 gene. Although many COL4A5 mutations have been detected, the mutation detection rate has been unsatisfactory. Some men with X-linked Alport syndrome show a relatively mild phenotype, but molecular basis investigations have rarely been conducted to clarify the underlying mechanism.Design, setting, participants, & measurements In total, 152 patients with X-linked Alport syndrome who were suspected of having Alport syndrome through clinical and pathologic investigations and referred to the hospital for mutational analysis between January of 2006 and January of 2013 were genetically diagnosed. Among those patients, 22 patients had suspected splice site mutations. Transcripts are routinely examined when suspected splice site mutations for abnormal transcripts are detected; 11 of them showed expected exon skipping, but others showed aberrant splicing patterns. The mutation detection strategy had two steps: (1) genomic DNA analysis using PCR and direct sequencing and (2) mRNA analysis using RT-PCR to detect RNA processing abnormalities.Results Six splicing consensus site mutations resulting in aberrant splicing patterns, one exonic mutation leading to exon skipping, and four deep intronic mutations producing cryptic splice site activation were identified. Interestingly, one case produced a cryptic splice site with a single nucleotide substitution in the deep intron that led to intronic exonization containing a stop codon; however, the patient showed a clearly milder phenotype for X-linked Alport syndrome in men with a truncating mutation. mRNA extracted from the kidney showed both normal and abnormal transcripts, with the normal transcript resulting in the milder phenotype. This novel mechanism leads to mild clinical characteristics.Conclusions This report highlights the importance of analyzing transcripts to enhance the mutation detection rate and provides insight into genotype-phenotype correlations. This approach can clarify the cause of atypically mild phenotypes in X-linked Alport syndrome.

Our reference values will be applicable for screening renal function in Japanese children.

There have been no previous reports of the determination of reference serum Cr levels by enzymatic methods in Japanese children. Our formula will be applicable for screening of renal function in Japanese children.

This kindred illustrates that a CFB mutation (c.1050G > C, p.Lys350Asn) can result in aHUS. In the future, phenotype-genotype correlations and outcome in CFB-mutated aHUS patients need to be further investigated by accumulation of a number of cases.

The aim of this study was to investigate age-related pharmacokinetic differences of cyclosporine (CyA) in children with nephrotic syndrome. Whole blood concentrations of CyA were monitored for a total of 96 times in 36 cases. The 25 male and 11 female patients ranged in age from 1.9 to 19.7 years with a mean age of 9.1 years. Renal biopsy showed minimal change in 33 patients and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in three patients. CyA was orally administered in two divided doses just before meals. The doses of CyA administered were adjusted such that the target value for blood concentration at 2 h post-dose (C2) was 400-450 ng/ml. The 96 subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group I, 1-5 years (n = 30); group II, 6-10 years (n = 34); and group III, ≥ 11 years (n = 32). In all subjects, peak levels (Cmax) of CyA were reached at C1 or C2. There was no significant difference between the groups for C2, area under the whole blood concentration-time curve up to 4 h post-dose (AUC0-4), and Cmax. The mean CyA doses of groups I, II, and III were 4.8 ± 1.0 mg/kg/day, 3.8 ± 0.9 mg/kg/day, and 3.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg/day, respectively, and there were significant differences between every two groups. In addition, the dose-normalized Cmax (Cmax/dose) and AUC0-4 (AUC0-4/dose) values were significantly lower in the younger group than in the older group. These findings suggested that in children, when the same concentration is targeted, the required CyA dose would vary according to age but would be significantly higher for the younger children.