The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of SM-17466, a new 1␤-methyl carbapenem, were evaluated against a wide range of clinical bacterial isolates and compared with the activities of meropenem, imipenem, vancomycin, and arbekacin. SM-17466 had a broad spectrum of action against gram-positive bacteria, showing especially potent activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. The MICs of SM-17466, meropenem, imipenem, vancomycin, and arbekacin at which 90% of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were inhibited were 3.13, 50, 100, 1.56, and 3.13 g/ml, respectively. This activity of SM-17466 was almost equivalent to those of the antibiotics used for the treatment of infections caused by this organism. SM-17466 also showed bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. In contrast, SM-17466 was less active against gram-negative bacteria, especially against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, compared with the other carbapenems; however, of the carbapenems, SM-17466 exhibited the highest activity against Haemophilus influenzae and Bacteroides fragilis. SM-17466, at a 50% inhibitory concentration of less than 1 g/ml, bound to penicillin-binding proteins 1 to 4 in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and also had good binding to penicillinbinding protein 2 in a methicillin-resistant strain (50% inhibitory concentration, 5.9 g/ml). This high affinity, which was 10 and 20 times greater than those for meropenem and imipenem, respectively, was reflected in the potent activity of SM-17466 against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. SM-17466 demonstrated excellent in vivo efficacy against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus strains in a mouse peritoneal infection model: the efficacy of SM-17466 against methicillin-resistant strains was equal to or one-third that of vancomycin. This activity was comparable to the in vitro activity of SM-17466. The subcutaneous injection of SM-17466 in mice revealed that the half-life of SM-17466 in serum was about 18 min, intermediate between those of vancomycin and arbekacin and 1.5-fold that of imipenem-cilastatin. SM-17466 was resistant to hydrolysis by swine renal dehydropeptidase I, to an extent comparable to the resistance shown by meropenem.

SM-216601 is a novel parenteral 1␤-methylcarbapenem. In agar dilution susceptibility testing, the MIC of SM-216601 for 90% of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains tested (MIC 90 ) was 2 g/ml, which was comparable to those of vancomycin and linezolid. SM-216601 was also very potent against Enterococcus faecium, including vancomycin-resistant strains (MIC 90 ‫؍‬ 8 g/ml). SM-216601 exhibited potent activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis, with MIC 90 s of less than 0.5 g/ml, and intermediate activity against Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The therapeutic efficacy of SM-216601 against experimentally induced infections in mice caused by S. aureus, E. faecium, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa reflected its in vitro activity and plasma level. Thus, SM-216601 is a promising candidate for nosocomial bacterial infections caused by a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including multiresistant pathogens.

To investigate combinations of antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the in vitro effects of combinations of meropenem with each of three aminoglycosides, arbekacin, amikacin and netilmicin, were evaluated using an agar dilution chequerboard technique. The combinations of meropenem and aminoglycosides were effective against almost all P. aeruginosa strains tested, which included meropenem-resistant strains. Increased synergic effects were observed in combinations that included arbekacin or amikacin. None of the combinations had an antagonistic effect. Most of the synergic and additive effects were achieved at clinically relevant concentrations.

No abstract

Background:No clinical studies have compared the efficacy of liposomal formulation AMB (L-AMB) and voriconazole (VRC) in the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of L-AMB and VRC in murine pulmonary aspergillosis.Methods: Leucopenic mice were infected intratracheally with Aspergillus fumigatus and treated intravenously with L-AMB (once a day) or VRC (twice a day). Results: L-AMB and VRC at a dose of ≥5 and ≥20 mg/kg, respectively, significantly prolonged the survival time of infected mice and reduced the pulmonary fungal burden in comparison with the control group. At the maximum recommended dose for clinical use, 5 mg/kg of L-AMB exhibited greater efficacy than 10 mg/kg of VRC, which achieved an area under the concentration-time curve level equivalent to that of 6 mg/kg (loading dose) in humans, in terms of increasing survival and reducing the fungal burden. Conclusion: The in vivo efficacy of L-AMB was superior to that of VRC at the maximum recommended dose in a murine pulmonary aspergillosis model.