A method was developed to quantify prostate metabolite concentrations using (1)H high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) spectroscopy. T(1) and T(2) relaxation times (in milliseconds) were determined for the major prostate metabolites and an internal TSP standard, and used to optimize the acquisition and repetition times (TRs) at 11.7 T. At 1 degrees C, polyamines (PAs; T(1mean) = 100 +/- 13, T(2mean) = 30.8 +/- 7.4) and citrate (Cit; T(1mean) = 237 +/- 39, T(2mean) = 68.1 +/- 8.2) demonstrated the shortest relaxation times, while taurine (Tau; T(1mean) = 636 +/- 78, T(2mean) = 331 +/- 71) and choline (Cho; T(1mean) = 608 +/- 60, T(2mean) = 393 +/- 81) demonstrated the longest relaxation times. Millimolal metabolite concentrations were calculated for 60 postsurgical tissues using metabolite and TSP peak areas, and the mass of tissue and TSP. Phosphocholine plus glycerophosphocholine (PC+GPC), total choline (tCho), lactate (Lac), and alanine (Ala) concentrations were higher in prostate cancer ([PC+GPC](mean) = 9.34 +/- 6.43, [tCho](mean) = 13.8 +/- 7.4, [Lac](mean) = 69.8 +/- 27.1, [Ala](mean) = 12.6 +/- 6.8) than in healthy glandular ([PC+GPC](mean) = 3.55 +/- 1.53, P < 0.01; [tCho](mean) = 7.06 +/- 2.36, P < 0.01; [Lac](mean) = 46.5 +/- 17.4, P < 0.01; [Ala](mean) = 8.63 +/- 4.91, P = 0.051) and healthy stromal tissues ([PC+GPC](mean) = 4.34 +/- 2.46, P < 0.01; [tCho](mean) = 7.04 +/- 3.10, P < 0.01; [Lac](mean) = 45.1 +/- 18.6, P < 0.01; [Ala](mean) = 6.80 +/- 2.95, P < 0.01), while Cit and PA concentrations were significantly higher in healthy glandular tissues ([Cit](mean) = 43.1 +/- 21.2, [PAs](mean) = 18.5 +/- 15.6) than in healthy stromal ([Cit](mean) = 16.1 +/- 5.6, P < 0.01; [PAs](mean) = 3.15 +/- 1.81, P < 0.01) and prostate cancer tissues ([Cit](mean) = 19.6 +/- 12.7, P < 0.01; [PAs](mean) = 5.28 +/- 5.44, P < 0.01). Serial spectra acquired over 12 hr indicated that the degradation of Cho-containing metabolites was minimized by acquiring HR-MAS data at 1 degree C compared to 20 degrees C.

No abstract

No abstract

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Very few comparative studies to date evaluate the results of treatment options for prostate cancer using the most sensitive measurement tools. PSA has been identified as the most sensitive tool for measuring treatment effectiveness. To date, comprehensive unbiased reviews of all the current literature are limited for prostate cancer. This is the first large scale comprehensive review of the literature comparing risk stratified patients by treatment option and with long‐term follow‐up. The results of the studies are weighted, respecting the impact of larger studies on overall results. The study identified a lack of uniformity in reporting results amongst institutions and centres. A large number of studies have been conducted on the primary therapy of prostate cancer but very few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. The comparison of outcomes from individual studies involving surgery (radical prostatectomy or robotic radical prostatectomy), external beam radiation (EBRT) (conformal, intensity modulated radiotherapy, protons), brachytherapy, cryotherapy or high intensity focused ultrasound remains problematic due to the non‐uniformity of reporting results and the use of varied disease outcome endpoints. Technical advances in these treatments have also made long‐term comparisons difficult. The Prostate Cancer Results Study Group was formed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments. This international group conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify all studies involving treatment of localized prostate cancer published during 2000–2010. Over 18 000 papers were identified and a further selection was made based on the following key criteria: minimum/median follow‐up of 5 years; stratification into low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups; clinical and pathological staging; accepted standard definitions for prostate‐specific antigen failure; minimum patient number of 100 in each risk group (50 for high‐risk group). A statistical analysis (standard deviational ellipse) of the study outcomes suggested that, in terms of biochemical‐free progression, brachytherapy provides superior outcome in patients with low‐risk disease. For intermediate‐risk disease, the combination of EBRT and brachytherapy appears equivalent to brachytherapy alone. For high‐risk patients, combination therapies involving EBRT and brachytherapy plus or minus androgen deprivation therapy appear superior to more localized treatments such as seed implant alone, surgery alone or EBRT. It is anticipated that the study will assist physicians and patients in selecting treatment for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND.Active surveillance followed by selective treatment for men who have evidence of disease progression may be an option for select patients with early‐stage prostate cancer. In this article, the authors report their experience in a contemporary cohort of men with prostate cancer who were managed with active surveillance.METHODS.All men who were managed initially with active surveillance were identified through the authors' institutional database. Selection criteria for active surveillance included: prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason sum ≤6 with no pattern 4 or 5, cancer involvement of <33% of biopsy cores, and clinical stage T1/T2a tumor. Patients were followed with PSA measurements and digital rectal examination every 3 to 6 months and with transrectal ultrasound at 6‐ to 12‐month intervals. Beginning in 2003, patients also underwent repeat prostate biopsy at 12 to 24 months. The primary outcome measured was active treatment. Evidence of disease progression, defined as an increase in rebiopsy Gleason sum or significant PSA velocity changes (>0.75 ng/mL per year), was a secondary outcome. Chi‐square and log‐rank tests were used to compare groups. The association between clinical characteristics and receipt of active treatment was analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards regression.RESULTS.Three hundred twenty‐one men (mean age [±standard deviation]: 63.4 ± 8.5 years) selected active surveillance as their initial management. The overall median follow‐up was 3.6 years (range, 1–17 years). The initial mean PSA level was 6.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL. One hundred twenty men (37%) met at least 1 criterion for progression. Overall, 38% of men had higher grade on repeat biopsy, and 26% of men had a PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL per year. Seventy‐eight men (24%) received secondary treatment at a median 3 years (range, 1–17 years) after diagnosis. Approximately 13% of patients with no disease progression elected to obtain treatment. PSA density at diagnosis and rise in Gleason score on repeat biopsy were associated significantly with receipt of secondary treatment. The disease‐specific survival rate was 100%.CONCLUSIONS.Selected individuals with early‐stage prostate cancer may be candidates for active surveillance. Specific criteria can be and need to be developed to select the most appropriate individuals for this form of management and to monitor disease progression. A small attrition rate can be expected because of men who are unable or unwilling to tolerate surveillance. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.