Cytomegalovirus reactivation (CMVR) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a frequent complication related to survival outcomes, but the impact of CMVR on relapse is still unclear, especially in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this nationwide retrospective study, we included patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and ALL in first or second complete remission who underwent their first HCT using pre-emptive strategy for CMVR. Because ninety percent of cases with CMVR had occurred by day 64 and ninety percent of cases with grades II to IV acute GVHD had occurred by day 58, a landmark point was set at day 65. In the landmark analyses, 3793 patients with AML and 2213 patients with ALL who survived without relapse for at least 65 days were analyzed. In the multivariate analyses, CMVR was associated with a lower incidence of relapse in both AML (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.95; P = 0.009) and ALL (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99; P = 0.045). These findings were confirmed when we treated CMVR as a time-dependent covariate. Moreover, our study suggested that the protective effect of CMVR on relapse was independent of acute GVHD. A post-hoc subgroup analysis that combined AML and ALL showed that CMVR had a mild anti-leukemia effect without effect modification in contrast to the impact of CMVR on NRM. Our findings may provide important implications for the strategy used for CMV prophylaxis after HCT.
Background: We previously identified tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) as a biomarker of disease activity that distinguished mildly or highly active antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) from remission 6 months after the initiation of remission-induction therapy. In the present study, we investigated whether TIMP-1 is clinically useful as a predictor of relapse and sustained remission in AAV patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) during maintenance therapy.Methods: The relationship between serum TIMP-1 levels and clinical outcomes in AAV patients receiving maintenance therapy was assessed using the follow-up data of a Japanese large-cohort study (the RemIT-JAV-RPGN study) and data collected from AAV patients on maintenance therapy in our hospital (the MAAV-EU study).Results: In the RemIT-JAV RPGN study, serum levels of TIMP-1 were significantly higher in mildly active AAV patients with MPA and GPA (median BVAS 5) 6 months after the initiation of remission-induction therapy than in patients in remission. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in C-reactive protein (CRP) or myeloperoxidase-ANCA levels between these groups. Regarding maintenance therapy, elevated levels of TIMP-1 in patients in remission were associated with relapse and/or difficulty reducing the glucocorticoid dosage after 6 to 12 months. In the MAAV-EU study, serum levels of TIMP-1 were elevated in relapsed patients 6 months before relapse, earlier than the increase in serum levels of CRP. Analyses of both studies revealed that approximately 30% of patients in remission with a serum TIMP-1 level ≥ 150 ng/mL relapsed after 6 to 12 months, while the majority of patients with a TIMP-1 level < 150 ng/mL sustained remission for at least 12 months. This result suggests that a serum TIMP-1 level < 150 ng/mL reflects complete remission and ≥ 150 ng/mL indicates subclinical inflammation, even with BVAS 0.Conclusion: We herein demonstrated that TIMP-1 is more useful as a predictive biomarker of sustained remission than as a predictor of relapse in maintenance therapy for AAV. TIMP-1 levels < 150 ng/mL are important for the long-term maintenance of remission and may be an indicator for the tapering or cessation of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.