Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

To make an article a possible 'citation classic' in anaesthesiology, it should be published in one of six leading journals and originate from an established institute in North America. Internet resources to publish and cite the literature have to date not advanced any article published in the last 5 years to the top 100 list.

Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers have proved to be effective for the management of various cardiovascular diseases and the prevention of perioperative cardiac events and cerebrovascular accidents. Landiolol is a short-acting beta-blocker, with high beta 1-selectivity and a short duration of action. We thought landiolol was valuable and suitable for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and conducted a retrospective study. The records of 80 patients (58 post-surgical patients; group S and 22 internal medicine patients; group IM) were reviewed. Thirty-seven (64%) of the group S patients were post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and the IM group consisted mostly of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The most common indication for landiolol in group S was the prevention of myocardial ischemia (50%), and in group IM, it was atrial fibrillation (45%). The median infusion rate of landiolol was 5 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) and the median infusion time was 2 days. Twenty-six patients were continued on oral beta-adrenergic receptor blockers. Landiolol reduced heart rate significantly without reducing blood pressure, and stabilized hemodynamics. We confirmed that landiolol is valuable as a bridge to starting oral beta-adrenergic receptor blockers and as an anti-arrhythmic agent, and that it is suitable for ICU patients due to its high beta 1-selectivity and rapid onset and offset of action.

Several hemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers are available for use in clinical situations, but their use risks inducing cardiovascular dysfunction as a result of Hb interacting with nitric oxide. Hb vesicles (HbV) are liposome-encapsulated purified human Hb with polyethylene glycol chains at the surface. This study evaluated the effects of HbV on hemodynamics, tissue and systemic oxygenation, and osmotic pressure after fluid resuscitation in an acute hemorrhagic shock model. Hemorrhagic shock was induced in 24 anesthetized mechanically ventilated male rabbits by withdrawing blood to a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of 30 to 35 mmHg over 15 min and maintaining this state for 30 min. The animals were resuscitated by replacing the blood with equal volumes of HbV in recombinant human albumin solution (HbV/rHSA), rHSA alone, or Ringer lactated solution (RL), or with three times the withdrawn volume of RL and observed for 2 h. Fluid resuscitation restored MAP, central venous pressure, and cardiac index values, but these fell again within 2 h in rabbits treated with RL. Fluid resuscitation using HbV/rHSA immediately increased MAP and cardiac index but not systemic vascular resistance, maintained a high level of oxygen consumption, and reduced the blood glucose level, which increased after hemorrhage. Fluid resuscitation using HbV/rHSA did not disturb microoxygenation in the brain, kidneys, liver, or muscle; allowed an immediate recovery of tissue oxygenation without decreasing cardiac output or increasing systemic vascular resistance, and increased the oxygen consumption. HbV solution offers the advantages of systemic oxygenation without impairing microcirculation in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock.