Older women with HIV/AIDS constitute an invisible population that is often ignored by organizers of HIV prevention efforts as well as by HIV and aging organizations. This article explores the importance of a feminist approach to practice with a population affected by the intersection of ageism, sexism, and AIDS phobia. A support group for midlife and older women with HIV/AIDS is described, and four themes that were identified by the group participants are discussed. AIDS service organizations, the aging network, and policy makers must begin to recognize the critical need to support and assist older women with HIV/AIDS.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Integral to the text is a lesson on mass incarceration, the prison industrial complex, and current grassroots community-based efforts to end the reliance on the criminal legal system for community safety. Various archetypal narratives (white supremacy, patriarchy, xenophobia) intersect and push forward racialized and violent policing of gender nonconformity by law enforcement on the ground, as well as judges, juries, and prisons. Intersectionality is foundational to the realities of queer injustice. Those who are engaged in social justice work across disciplines would benefit from considering this text in their work, a part of the puzzle demanding complex solutions to multifaceted injustices. The authors question notions of ''us'' and ''them''-so often used to create distance and to rationalize injustice and the lack of action-and caution against the overreliance on traditional crime and punishment, including hate crime legislation: ''Queer criminalizing archetypes stick to all of us like unwanted burrs, no matter how much distance we try to put between 'us' and 'them.' The choice to pursue strategies that rely on increased policing and punishment to produce safety for queers requires a leap of faith that the system can and will be able to distinguish between the 'good' or reputable gay, lesbian, or transgender victim and the 'bad,' presumptively criminalized queers'' (p. 146). This call for systemic change is particularly relevant to social work. Missing from examples of grassroots organizing work to transform the system is an exploration of any work occurring to quell these injustices from within the system. For instance, do any judges, police departments, or prosecutors heed these systemic injustices in action? Are any formal criminal legal institutions taking steps to achieve a more just system? Because of intersectionalty and the interdisciplinary realities, ideas for disciplines to apply specific skills, spaces, and power to transform the criminal legal system would be helpful. Queer (In)Justice is an in-depth account of historical and current intersecting injustices and a clear invitation for multiple disciplines to join the collaborative fight to end the criminalization of queers and to increase justice. As most social workers know, the work is never easy and often complicated. This book is an important and integral tool for all as we move forward in the collaborative work of social justice.