Objective: To determine if categorizing fecal incontinence (FI) as urgency or passive FI is clinically meaningful, we compared clinical severity, quality of life, physical examination findings, and functional and anatomic deficits between women with urgency and passive FI.Methods: This study is a prospective cross-sectional study of women with at least monthly FI. All women completed the St Mark's Vaizey and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaires and underwent anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound. We compared women with urgency FI to women with passive FI.Results: Forty-six women were enrolled, 21 (46%) with urgency FI and 25 (54%) with passive FI. Clinical severity by Vaizey score did not differ between groups (urgency 11.7 ± 1.6 vs passive 11.0 ± 1.0, P = 0.51). Women with urgency FI had worse median (range) lifestyle and coping scores than passive FI (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life: lifestyle domain 2.5 [1, 4] vs 3.8 [1, 4], P = 0.04; coping domain 1.7 [1, 3] vs 2.4 [0.9, 4], P < 0.01). Women with urgency FI had higher anal resting and squeeze pressure than passive FI (60 ± 4 mm Hg vs 49 ± 3 mm Hg, P = 0.03; 78 [48, 150] mm Hg vs 60 [40, 103], P = 0.05). Internal anal sphincter defects were more common in women with passive FI (41.7% vs 30.0%, P = 0.53) and external anal sphincter defects more common in women with urgency FI (25% vs 16.7%, P = 0.71), but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions:We identified functional and anatomic differences between women with urgency FI and passive FI. Pheonotyping women with FI into these subtypes is clinically meaningful.

Low levels of physical activity are associated with greater nocturia and nocturnal enuresis. Sedentary behavior is a new construct that may be associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. Physical activity and sedentary behavior represent potential new targets for treating nocturnal urinary tract symptoms.

Aims To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of a home‐based integrated physical exercise and bladder‐training program vs usual care in community‐dwelling women with urinary incontinence (UI). Methods We conducted a parallel arm, nonblinded, pilot randomized controlled trial of a home‐based integrated physical exercise and bladder training with urge suppression and fall prevention program (ExerciseUP) vs usual care in women aged 65 and older with UI. Outcomes included feasibility (process, resources, management, and acceptability), urinary symptoms, and falls risk using self‐administered questionnaires. Objective physical activity was measured using accelerometry. Results A total of 37 of 38 (97%) eligible women were willing to participate in the study. In the ExerciseUP intervention cohort, 17 of 19 (89%) women completed all 6 weeks of intervention and follow‐up, and 16 of 18 (89%) women in the usual group completed follow‐up. Ten (53%) women in the ExerciseUP group achieved at least 70% adherence to exercise prescription. The improvement in UI severity scores from baseline was greater in the ExerciseUP intervention group than the usual care group (− 6.2 ± 5.8 vs − 2.4 ± 4.2, P = 0.04). Fall‐risk score decreased (improved) in both groups. There were no significant between‐group differences in change in physical activity or sedentary behavior. Conclusions We determined that it would be feasible to conduct a home‐based exercise intervention in older women with UI. Our clinical outcomes were modestly favorable for the ExerciseUP intervention group.

Objective The aim of the study was to investigate dietary modification strategies used by community-dwelling older women to manage their fecal incontinence (FI). Methods We conducted a qualitative study with focus groups wherein women 65 years and older with FI shared their experiences managing the condition. We explored the following: (1) association between diet and FI symptoms, (2) dietary strategies and modifications used by older women to manage FI, and (3) patient input about disseminating diet modification information and strategies. All focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed to identify relevant themes. Results Twenty-one women participated in 3 focus groups. All participants were aware that diet plays a key role in their experience of FI and women described a method of “trial and error” in identifying specific aspects of their diet that contributed to their FI symptoms. Women reported modifications including avoiding or limiting several foods and food categories, changing certain methods of food preparation, as well as varying the amounts and frequency of meals to manage their FI. Women articulated several suggestions including the importance of physician input, using a balanced approach when making recommendations, and the value of sharing individual experiences. Conclusions Older women with FI make several dietary modifications to manage their symptoms including limiting certain foods, changing methods of food preparation, and decreasing the amounts and frequency of meals. These strategies may be considered for inclusion in a diet modification plan that is culturally competent for older women with FI.