The Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway is a national initiative which co-commissions health and probation to work in partnership to enhance the criminal justice management of high risk offenders with personality disorder. Psychologically informed support is expected to augment the current provision for this client group alongside workforce training. The impact of training offender managers (OM) is uncertain and previous research has indicated training may be limited in its effectiveness. This paper examines the impact of a training and supervision model on the quality of formulations produced by offender managers and suggests that a model which teaches formulation through repeated consultation or the live supervision of practice leads to enhanced competencies in completing case formulations. The paper evaluates the quality of formulations produced by offender managers who have had their practice developed through repeated consultation with the OPD pathway (OPDOMs) in comparison with a generic group of offender managers. OPDOMs who have had the longest period of supervision with the project produced the highest quality formulations. The paper acknowledges a number of limitations but suggests that the model under scrutiny may usefully inform service delivery within the Offender Personality Disorder pathway.

Objective The evidence is that therapy only works for some. This study aimed to explore clients' subjective experience of non‐improvement; specifically how do participants who feel they have not benefitted from psychological therapy describe the experience and make sense of their therapy? Method Eight people from a National Health Service Psychological Therapies Department in the UK who felt their therapy had not resulted in improvement took part in semi‐structured interviews, later analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results Participants described a process, beginning with their difficulties, negative feelings about themselves, and initial hopes and anxieties for therapy. Once in therapy, participants described overwhelming fears of losing control and being judged. They described attempts to manage this, using self‐censoring and compliance. After therapy, while most could identify some gain, they felt disappointed and that they were having to ‘make do’. The sense of not having succeeded or being sufficiently deserving of further input, in turn, reinforced participants' initial negative self‐beliefs. Conclusion Although participants identified themselves as not having improved through therapy, the accounts suggested more complexity. All participants reported detrimental effects and accounts contained qualified, thoughtful descriptions of these experiences: participants acknowledged some gains, even though they felt that therapy had not met their expectations.

Purpose The Yorkshire and Humber Personality Disorder Partnership (YHPDP) provides psychological consultation and formulation to offender managers (OMs) within the National Probation Service as part of the offender personality disorder (OPD) pathway. The pathway highlights the importance of formulation-led case management to develop pathways for offenders with personality difficulties at high risk of causing serious harm to others. This study aims to ask what is the experience of psychological consultation/formulation on the relationship between a sample of service users (SUs) and their OMs. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with five OMs who had engaged in at least three consultations with YHPDP psychologists/psychotherapists within the OPD pathway. Qualitative methods were used to analyse the data, specifically interpretative phenomenological analysis, which is useful when dealing with complexity, process or novelty. Findings OMs experienced the consultation/formulation process to be containing and reflective. They found complex, emotionally demanding clients who have offended and have personality disorder traits could be responded to differently as a result of this process. From an OM perspective, this improved the relationship between themselves and their SUs and supported risk management. These conclusions must be tentative, as they are drawn from a small-scale qualitative study, but provides the basis for further research. Originality/value Although there is increasing research into the outcomes of the OPD pathway, little has been done regarding the experience of the relationship between OMs and SUs. This research takes a qualitative perspective to explore this area.