Vitamin K antagonists have been a mainstay of treatment for patients requiring anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, but direct oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran, have become increasingly prescribed. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran has a significantly lower risk of life-threatening bleeding; however, bleeding events can still occur, supporting the need for effective reversal strategies. Idarucizumab was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran when life-threatening bleeding occurs or an urgent need for an invasive medical procedure exists. Before idarucizumab's approval, reversal strategies included hemodialysis, coagulation factor replacement, and, in the setting of acute ingestion, activated charcoal. We describe the case of a 58-year-old, obese woman with a history of atrial fibrillation who developed acute kidney injury while taking dabigatran 150 mg twice/day, resulting in coagulopathy. Despite receiving idarucizumab 5 g and hemodialysis, there was a rebound increase in prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values, prompting administration of an additional 5-g dose of idarucizumab and continued hemodialysis, with subsequent PT and aPTT values remaining within their appropriate ranges. To our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe the successful use of repeat dosing of idarucizumab with hemodialysis to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. Although two doses of idarucizumab were given to our patient, this dosing regimen is not the current standard of practice. Administration of idarucizumab and the use of additional reversal strategies should involve an assessment of each individual patient's severity of bleeding and subsequent risk of thrombosis. Due to the recent availability of idarucizumab and varying success with alternative reversal strategies, additional knowledge is needed for the optimal reversal of anticoagulation from dabigatran.

An increase in fluoroquinolone resistance and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (TRUS) biopsy infections has prompted the need for alternative effective antibiotic prophylaxis. We aimed to compare ciprofloxacin and other single-agent therapies to combination therapy for efficacy and adverse effects. Men who underwent a TRUS biopsy within the VA Boston health care system with documented receipt of prophylactic antibiotics periprocedure were eligible for inclusion. Postprocedure infections within 30 days were ascertained by chart review from electronic records, including any inpatient, outpatient, or urgent-care visits. Among 455 evaluable men over a 3-year period, there were 25 infections (5.49%), with sepsis occurring in 2.4%, urinary tract infections (UTI) in 1.54%, and bacteremia in 0.44% of patients. Escherichia coli was the most common urine (89%) and blood (92%) pathogen, with fluoroquinolone resistance rates of 88% and 91%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin alone was associated with significantly more infections than ciprofloxacin plus an additional agent (P ‫؍‬ 0.014). Intramuscular gentamicin alone was also significantly associated with a higher infection rate obtained with all other regimens (P ‫؍‬ 0.004). Any single-agent regimen, including ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, or gentamicin, was associated with significantly higher infection rates than any combination regimen (odds ratio [OR], 4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47, 10.85; P ‫؍‬ 0.004). Diabetes, immunosuppressive condition or medication, hospitalization within the previous year, and UTI within the previous 6 months were not associated with infection risk. Clostridium difficile infections were similar. These findings suggest that ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin alone are inferior to a combination regimen. Institutions with high failure rates of prophylaxis for TRUS biopsies should consider combination regimens derived from their local data.

No abstract

Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of levothyroxine, a 3-day hold guideline for adult patients ordered for intravenous (IV) levothyroxine was implemented at a tertiary academic medical center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. Methods This single-center, retrospective analysis identified patients ordered for IV levothyroxine during a thirteen-week period before and after implementation of the guideline. The primary outcome was guideline adherence, defined as full implementation of the three-day hold. Secondary outcomes included the number of IV levothyroxine administrations avoided in the post-guideline group, extrapolated yearly cost avoidance (EYCA) post-guideline implementation, reasons for guideline non-adherence, and number of safety reports involving IV levothyroxine. Results A total of 166 and 134 patients met inclusion criteria for the pre and post-guideline groups, respectively. Guideline adherence was observed in 94 (70.1%) patients, resulting in 276 vials saved in the thirteen-week post-guideline period which translated to an EYCA of $139,877. Forty orders (29.9%) were non-adherent to the guideline with the most common reason stated as nil per os (NPO). No difference in safety outcomes was seen between the pre- and post-guideline groups as evidenced by one safety report in each group. Conclusion We observed a high rate of adherence to an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. This was associated with a substantial cost savings over the study period with no increase in reported safety events. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of an inpatient IV levothyroxine three-day hold guideline.

No abstract