The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in 10 Oregon vineyards was assessed by examining spores in soil and amplifying mycorrhizal DNA from roots. Seventeen spore morphotypes were found in soil, including seven species in the Acaulosporaceae. Eighteen phylotypes were amplified from grape roots with AM1 and NS31 primers, and clones were dominated by Glomus spp. (> 99%). A few clones (< 1%) representing a single phylotype within Gigasporaceae, and a single clone within Archaeosporaceae were amplified from roots with AM1-NS31 primers. A separate experiment employing known proportions of grape roots colonized by Glomus intraradices or by Gigaspora rosea showed that fungi within Gigasporaceae might be underrepresented in clone abundance when Glomus spp. co-occur in roots. No clones representing fungi within the Acaulosporaceae were amplified from vineyards, although specific fungi within Acaulosporaceae were shown to colonize Pinot noir roots in sterilized soil and were amplified from these roots. Four Glomus phylotypes, including G. intraradices, were found in roots from all 10 vineyards, and these fungi accounted for 81% of clones. AMF phylotypes amplified from roots did not change during the growing season, although six phylotypes varied with soil type. The presence of three phylotypes was affected by vineyard age, and phylotype richness appeared to decline as vineyard age increased beyond 20 y. PCA analysis supported the hypothesis that the AMF community is different in red-hill soils than in valley soils and indicated certain phylotypes might be associated with lower soil and vine nutrient status. However, the changes in the AMF community in grape roots across vineyards were subtle because most root samples were dominated by the same three or four phylotypes. A separate analysis using primers to amplify AMF from the Archeasporaceae/Paraglomeraceae showed most root samples also were colonized by at least one Paraglomus or Archaeospora phylotype.
We consider that the best timing of antenatal screening for vasa previa is the second trimester. Non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern without other possible causes warrants detailed examination of vasa previa.
1989. The Glycirte-Glorrtus-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis. IX. Nutritional, morphological and physiological responses of nodulated soybean to geographic isolates of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. -Physiol. Plant. 76: 226-232.The objective of the work was to determine differences in plant response to geographic isolates of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus, and to demonstrate the need for such determinations in the selection of desirable host-endophyte combinations for practical applications. Soybean {Glycine max (L.) Merr.) plants were inoculated with Bradyrhizoblum japonlcum and isolates of the VAM-fungal morphospecies Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe, collected from an arid (AR), semiarid (SA) or mesic (ME) area. Inoculum potentials of the VAMfungal isolates were determined and the inocula equalized, achieving the same level of root colonization (41%, /'>0.05) at harvest (50 days). Plants of the three VAM treatments (AR, SA and ME) were evaluated against nonVAM controls. Significant differences in plant response to colonization were found in dry mass, leaf K, N and P concentrations, and in root/shoot, nodule/root, root length/leaf area and root length/ root mass ratios. The differences were most pronounced and consistent between the AR and all other treatments. Photosynthesis and nodule activity were higher (P<0.05) in all VAM treatments, but only the AR plants had higher (P<0.05) photosynthetic water-use efficiency than the controls. Nodule activity, evaluated by HT evolution and CjH, reduction, differed significantly between treatments. The results are discussed in terms of nutritional and non-nutritional effects of VAM colonization on the development and physiology of the tripartite soybean association in the light of intraspecific variability within the fungal endophyte.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.