Background: Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy has become widespread, the advantage of uniportal VATS (U-VATS) segmentectomy over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to verify the safety and usefulness of U-VATS segmentectomy compared with conventional hybrid/multiportal segmentectomy.Methods: Here, we retrospectively reviewed the data from anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy cases in a single institution from March 2010 to March 2021. Patients were divided into the U-VATS and hybrid/ multiportal VATS (H/M-VATS) groups. Perioperative results were compared between the groups after matching for patient background characteristics. In addition, cases of complex segmentectomy were selected from each group and compared in terms of perioperative results.Results: A total of 180 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy during the study period at this institution, comprising 57 cases in the U-VATS group and 123 cases in the H/M-VATS group. After matching for age, sex, disease, tumor location, and type of segmentectomy, no significant differences between the groups were seen in blood loss, major intraoperative bleeding, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, or re-hospitalization within 30 days after discharge. Operation time (141±46 vs.174±45 min, P<0.001), postoperative drainage duration (1.5±1.2 vs. 2.3±1.8 days, P=0.007), and postoperative hospital stay (3.4±2.0 vs. 4.6±2.5 days, P=0.006) were significantly lower in the U-VATS group. Subgroup analysis of the complex segmentectomy cases also revealed that operation time (146±34 vs. 185±47 min, P<0.001), postoperative drainage duration (1.5±1.3 vs. 2.2±1.2 days, P=0.021), and postoperative hospital stay (3.0±1.4 vs. 4.9±2.1 days, P<0.001) were significantly reduced in the U-VATS group.Conclusions: U-VATS segmentectomy appears as safe and feasible as H/M-VATS segmentectomy. An experienced surgeon can make a smooth transition to U-VATS.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Minimally invasive surgeries are increasingly being performed. However, few studies have evaluated the learning curve for uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomies. Therefore, we investigated the learning curve for uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy in our department. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy at our institution between February 2019 and January 2022. Two senior surgeons [Hitoshi Igai (H.I.) and Natsumi Matsuura (N.M.)] performed all of the surgeries. H.I. introduced uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy in our department and supervised N.M. performing this operation. Resident surgeons participated in the operations as assistants. The learning curve for uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy was evaluated on the basis of operative time and cumulative sum (CUSUM OT ). Results The entire team, including resident surgeons, completed the learning curve by performing 60 surgeries. The learning curve consisted of three phases: initial learning (60 surgeries), accumulation of competence (16 surgeries), and acquisition of expertise (17 surgeries), respectively. The operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, and postoperative hospitalization time significantly improved across the phases. N.M. completed the initial learning curve faster than H.I. (16 and 29 surgeries, respectively). Conclusions Under supervision by an experienced surgeon, a team successfully completed the learning curve for uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and achieved good perioperative outcomes, which indicates the importance of appropriate supervision for acquiring expertise for this surgery.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to assess prospectively the validity and feasibility of segmentectomy using preoperative simulation and intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) with near-infrared (NIR) light thoracoscope to ensure a sufficient surgical margin. METHODS This study was a prospective, single-centre, phase II, feasibility study. From February to July 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and bronchography using simulation software. The dominant pulmonary artery of the targeted segment was selected to determine the dissection line and measure the surgical margin to the tumour. Intraoperatively, after the planned dissection of the pulmonary artery, ICG (0.3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously and observed with NIR, and dissection was performed along the line determined by preoperative simulation. Postoperatively, the pathological margin was compared with the simulation margin. RESULTS All surgeries were performed via an uniport (3.5–4.0-cm skin incision). The regions of segmentectomy were S2, S3, S6, S9 + 10 and S10 of the right side and S1 + 2 + 3, S3, S3 + 4 + 5, S6 and S8 of the left side. The difference between the simulation margin and the pathological margin was not significant (simulation 30.5 ± 10.1 vs pathological 31.0 ± 11.0 mm, P = 0.801). The simulation margin was well correlated with the pathological margin (R2 = 0.677). The proportion of cases successfully achieving the pathological margin of error of plus or minus 10 mm of the simulation margin was 90% (18 of 20 cases). CONCLUSIONS The combination of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography simulation and ICG–NIR was effective for securing a sufficient margin in segmentectomy.