Background This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) and attainability of sustained closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods EHS was defined as uninterrupted endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defect after colorectal ESD using an absorbable barbed suture and a through-the-scope needle holder. Following individual EHS training using an ex vivo porcine colonic model, two experienced endoscopists performed EHS. Repeat colonoscopy was performed on the third or fourth day after ESD to examine the EHS site. The primary end point was the complete EHS closure rate, and secondary end points were sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates. Results 11 lesions were included. Median size of the mucosal defect was 38 mm (range 25 – 55 mm) and the lesion characteristics were as follows: lower rectum/upper rectum/ascending colon/cecum = 3/3/2/3, and 0-IIa/0-Is + IIa/others = 5/4/2. EHS was not attempted in two patients owing to difficulty in colonoscope reinsertion after ESD and intraoperative perforation, respectively. EHS was performed for nine lesions, and the complete EHS closure rate was 73 %. Median procedure time for suturing was 56 minutes (range 30 – 120 minutes) and median number of stitches was 8 (range 6 – 12). Sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates were 64 % and 9 %, respectively. Conclusions EHS achieved complete and sustained closure in the colorectum. However, EHS is not currently clinically applicable given the long procedure time. Further modifications of the technique and devices are desirable.
Depression is implicated as a risk factor for the recurrence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are useful tools for evaluation of brain activity and a depressive state, respectively. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between brain activity or depressive symptoms and IBD using NIRS and BDNF. This study included 36 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, 32 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients, and 17 healthy controls (HC). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores were determined, NIRS was performed, and serum BDNF levels were measured in all subjects. NIRS showed that the mean oxygenated hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in the frontal lobe in the UC group than in the HC group (HC 167 ± 106 vs. UC 83.1 ± 85.3, p < 0.05). No significant difference was seen between the HC and CD groups. There were also no significant differences in CED-D scores and BDNF levels among the groups. Changes in the NIRS values of the UC group may indicate decreased brain activity and a fundamental difference between UC and CD, which are often lumped together as two types of IBD.
En bloc resection is essential for accurate pathological evaluation in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). This retrospective study aimed to clarify optimal treatment selection of endoscopic resection according to lesion size. A total of 760 patients underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between January 2011 and December 2015. Among them, this retrospective study included 196 solitary index SESCC lesions ≤20 mm, with the deepest invasion to the mucosa or superficial submucosa endoscopically. The lesions were classified according to size measured via endoscopy as follows; group A: lesions ≤10 mm, group B: lesions ≥11 mm but ≤15 mm, and group C: lesions ≥16 mm but ≤20 mm. The short- and long-term outcomes were investigated for EMR and ESD subgroups. In patients undergoing EMR and ESD, en bloc resection rates for group A and B were not different (98.8 vs. 100%, 93.3 vs. 100%, respectively). However, the en bloc resection rate was significantly lower in EMR than that in ESD for group C (64.3 vs. 100%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the use of adjunctive ablative therapy rate was significantly higher in EMR than that in ESD in group C (35.7 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate of group C was significantly higher than that of group A + B after EMR (P < 0.01). EMR was an adequate treatment for SESCC lesions ≤15 mm. On the other hand, ESD could be necessary to achieve en bloc resection for lesions ≥16 mm to avoid local recurrence.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is caused by the activation of an abnormal immune response in the intestinal mucosa; the spleen is involved in the main immune response. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) have different inflammatory mechanisms; this study aimed to quantitatively measure and compare the spleen volumes between patients with UC and CD and examine the relationship between spleen volume and disease activity in both. We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients with IBD aged 30–60 years (UC group, n = 24; CD group, n = 20). The control group comprised 19 patients with pancreatic cysts that did not affect the spleen volume. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) between April 2014 and March 2019. Using the Image J software, spleen volumes in the UC, CD, and control groups were measured accurately from the CT images and adjusted for the body weight. No significant differences in the sex, age, or body weight were noted between the UC and CD groups and the control group. The spleen volumes, adjusted for the body weight, were 2.2 ± 1.0 cm 3 /kg, 2.0 ± 1.0 cm 3 /kg, and 3.6 ± 1.7 cm 3 /kg in the control, UC, and CD groups, respectively. The volumes differed significantly between the CD and control groups ( P = .01), but not between the UC and control groups ( P = .43). Furthermore, a significant strong correlation was found between the disease activity and the body weight-adjusted spleen volume in patients with CD ( P < .01). The spleen volume, adjusted for the body weight, was significantly larger in patients with CD than in the controls and was also strongly correlated with the CD activity. These results suggest that the immune response in CD may affect the spleen volume.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.