Depth of submucosal invasion and lymphatic channel invasion were accurate predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. These two factors could be used in selecting appropriate cases for surgery after endoscopic resection.
Evaluation of pathologic predictors of metastases in T1 stage colorectal cancer may be difficult with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining alone. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of pathologic predictors by using immunohistochemical staining and Elastica van Gieson (EVG) staining. One hundred and twenty-four patients who underwent bowel resection for single T1 stage colorectal cancer from 1990 to 2004 in 1 institution were studied. D2-40, EVG staining, and CAM5.2 were used to detect lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and tumor budding, respectively. These 3 factors were separately evaluated based on HE staining. Histology was reviewed by 1 pathologist. Lymph node metastases in the surgical specimen were the standard reference, and distant metastases were identified by periodic computed tomography for 2 years or more after surgery. A logistic regression model was applied to analyze risk factors for lymph node metastases and a Cox regression model for distant metastases. In predicting lymph node metastases, univariate analysis demonstrated significance for all predictors except venous invasion by HE staining. Multivariate analysis showed that venous invasion by EVG and tumor budding by HE showed significance as predictors. In predicting distant metastases, univariate analysis showed significance for lymphatic invasion shown by D2-40, tumor budding shown by CAM5.2 and HE, and lymph node metastases. Multivariate analysis showed only venous invasion by EVG stain as being significantly associated with distant metastases (P=0.001). In conclusion, venous invasion evaluated shown by EVG staining is a useful pathologic predictor for metastases in T1 stage colorectal cancer.
Background: The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer has been demonstrated, and the risk of gastric cancer occurrence is known to increase with the progression of atrophic changes associated with chronic gastritis. Endoscopic evaluation of the degree and extent of atrophy of the gastric mucosa is a simple and very important means of identifying a group at high risk for gastric cancer. This study aimed to clarify the carcinogenic risk in relation to the degree of atrophy. Methods: A total of 27,777 patients (272 with early gastric cancer and 135 with advanced gastric cancer) were included in this study. Endoscopically evaluated atrophy of the gastric mucosa was classified as C-0 to O-3 according to the Kimura and Takemoto classification system. Results: The cancer detection rate in relation to the degree of gastric mucosal atrophy was 0.04% (2/4,183 patients) for C-0, 0% (0/4,506) for C-1, 0.25% (9/3,660) for C-2, 0.71% (21/2,960) for C-3, 1.32% (75/5,684) for O-1, 3.70% (140/3,780) for O-2 and 5.33% (160/3,004) for O-3. As to the proportions of differentiated and undifferentiated cancers, the latter were relatively frequent in the C-0 to C-2 groups, but differentiated cancers became predominant as atrophy progressed. On the other hand, the number of both differentiated and undifferentiated cancers detected increased as gastric mucosal atrophy progressed. In addition, open-type atrophy was found in 29 (96.7%) of 30 patients with synchronous multiple gastric cancers and in all 20 patients with metachronous multiple gastric cancers. Conclusion: Endoscopic evaluation of gastric mucosal atrophy can provide a simple and reliable predictive index for both current and future carcinogenic risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.