In this study this version of the GDS-15-J displayed excellent psychometric properties using a 6/7 cut off. Analyses suggest some items that might be removed in future studies of an abbreviated scale.
To further investigate the immunological mechanisms involved, we analyzed the expression of costimulatory molecules in aortic tissue and their counterpart molecules on infiltrating cells of patients with Takayasu’s arteritis. We also examined the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related (MIC) A in aortic tissue, which is known to be induced by external stress, and its counterpart NKG2D receptors on infiltrating cells. Among these costimulatory molecules, strong expression of 4-1BBL and Fas was induced in the aortic tissue, and most of the infiltrating cells expressed 4-1BB and FasL, suggesting these pathways play critical roles in T-cell-mediated vascular injury. We also found that MICA was strongly induced in the aortic tissue and that at least part of the infiltrating cells expressed NKG2D receptors. Some infiltrating cells – but not vascular smooth muscle cells – seemed to have undergone apoptosis. Our findings strongly suggest that 4-1BB/4-1BBL and Fas/FasL pathways play important roles in vascular injury in Takayasu’s arteritis. We assume that γδ T cells infiltrated aortic tissue recognizing MICA, resulting in the induction of MHC antigens and costimulatory molecules, and then αβ T-cells infiltrated recognizing some auto-antigens presented by MHC antigens, leading to chronic inflammation.
BackgroundFor patients starting treatment for depression, current guidelines recommend titrating the antidepressant dosage to the maximum of the licenced range if tolerated. When patients do not achieve remission within several weeks, recommendations include adding or switching to another antidepressant. However, the relative merits of these guideline strategies remain unestablished.MethodsThis multi-centre, open-label, assessor-blinded, pragmatic trial involved two steps. Step 1 used open-cluster randomisation, allocating clinics into those titrating sertraline up to 50 mg/day or 100 mg/day by week 3. Step 2 used central randomisation to allocate patients who did not remit after 3 weeks of treatment to continue sertraline, to add mirtazapine or to switch to mirtazapine. The primary outcome was depression severity measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (scores between 0 and 27; higher scores, greater depression) at week 9. We applied mixed-model repeated-measures analysis adjusted for key baseline covariates.ResultsBetween December 2010 and March 2015, we recruited 2011 participants with hitherto untreated major depression at 48 clinics in Japan. In step 1, 970 participants were allocated to the 50 mg/day and 1041 to the 100 mg/day arms; 1927 (95.8%) provided primary outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference in the adjusted PHQ-9 score at week 9 between the 50 mg/day arm and the 100 mg/day arm (0.25 point, 95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.58 to 1.07, P = 0.55). Other outcomes proved similar in the two groups.In step 2, 1646 participants not remitted by week 3 were randomised to continue sertraline (n = 551), to add mirtazapine (n = 537) or to switch to mirtazapine (n = 558): 1613 (98.0%) provided primary outcomes. At week 9, adding mirtazapine achieved a reduction in PHQ-9 scores of 0.99 point (0.43 to 1.55, P = 0.0012); switching achieved a reduction of 1.01 points (0.46 to 1.56, P = 0.0012), both relative to continuing sertraline. Combination increased the percentage of remission by 12.4% (6.1 to 19.0%) and switching by 8.4% (2.5 to 14.8%). There were no differences in adverse effects.ConclusionsIn patients with new onset depression, we found no advantage of titrating sertraline to 100 mg vs 50 mg. Patients unremitted by week 3 gained a small benefit in reduction of depressive symptoms at week 9 by switching sertraline to mirtazapine or by adding mirtazapine.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01109693. Registered on 23 April 2010.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1096-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.