Monoclonal anti-nuclear antibodies which are complexed to nucleosomes are able to bind to the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in vivo, whereas purified antibodies do not bind. The positively charged histone moieties in the nucleosome are-responsible for the binding to anionic determinants in the GBM. We tested the hypothesis that the specificity of the autoantibodies complexed to the nucleosome influences the glomerular binding of the antibody-nucleosome complex. We induced the formation of these immune complexes in vivo, by intraperitoneal inoculation of hybridomas producing monoclonal anti-nuclear antibodies (four anti-histone, three anti-double stranded (ds)DNA and three anti-nucleosome antibodies) into nude BALB/c mice. In ascites and plasma from the mice inoculated with these hybridomas, nucleosome/autoantibody complexes were detected in comparable amounts. Immunofluorescence of kidney sections revealed that about 60% of the mice inoculated with anti-nucleosome or anti-dsDNA hybridomas had immunoglobulin deposits in the GBM, whereas only 15% of the mice with anti-histone hybridomas showed these deposits (p < or = 0.04). In the Matrigel-ELISA (used as a GBM surrogate) ascites from anti-nucleosome or anti-DNA hybridomas displayed significantly higher titers (p < or = 0.002) than ascites from anti-histone hybridomas. In conclusion, nucleosome/immunoglobulin complexes comprising anti-nucleosome or anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies do bind more frequently to the GBM in vivo than nucleosome/immunoglobulin complexes containing anti-histone antibodies. It therefore appears that the specificity of the antibody bound to the nucleosome is a critical determinant for the nephritogenic potential of the nucleosome-autoantibody complex.

Monoclonal anti-nucleosome antibodies (mAbs) complexed to nucleosomal antigens can bind to DNA and to heparan sulfate (HS) in ELISA and to the GBM in vivo in a rat renal perfusion system, whereas non-complexed mAbs do not bind [1]. In this study, we analyzed whether heparin (HEP) or N-desulfated/acetylated heparins (DSA-HEP), structurally and functionally strongly related to HS, are able to prevent the binding of these complexed mAbs to DNA and to HS in vitro and to rat GBM in vivo. In ELISA the binding of nucleosome complexed antinucleosome antibodies to DNA and HS was inhibited dose-dependently by HEP, DSA-HEP and low molecular weight (LMW) DSA-HEP. Intravenous injection of nucleosome/anti-nucleosome immune complexes without heparin/heparinoids in BALB/c mice led to GBM binding, while simultaneous injection of heparin/heparinoids with complexed antibodies or pretreatment with heparin subcutaneously prior to injection of complexes prevented this binding. Subsequently, we tested the preventive effect of HEP, DSA-HEP and LMW-DSA-HEP on progression of renal disease in MRL/lpr mice. Treatment was started at an age of eight weeks in a dose of 50 micrograms daily. With all three drugs albuminuria was significantly delayed compared to PBS treated controls (cumulative incidence of proteinuria at 20 weeks in controls 60% vs. 13%, 14% and 6% respectively for HEP, DSA-HEP and LMW-DSA-HEP; P < 0.05). At week 21 the glomerulonephritis was histologically less severe in heparin/heparinoid treated animals (P = 0.02). In immunofluorescence the amount of immunoglobulin and C3 deposits in the glomerular capillary wall tended to be less in heparin/heparinoid treated mice compared to PBS treated controls (P = 0.07). Furthermore, at 20 weeks anti-HS levels in plasma of heparin/heparinoid treated mice were significantly lower (P < 0.05). We conclude that interaction of heparin or heparin analogs with HS reactive immune complexes containing nucleosomal antigens prevents the binding of these immune complexes to the GBM and delays nephritis in MRL/lpr mice.

C hristine S tem m eri, P a sc a le R ich alet-S écord el, M ieke v a n B ru ggen §, K ees K ram ers §,

No abstract

The hypercoagulable state observed in COVID-19 could be responsible for morbidity and mortality. In this retrospective study we investigated whether therapeutic anticoagulation prior to infection has a beneficial effect in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. 1154 COVID-19 patients admitted to 6 hospitals in the Netherlands between March and May 2020 were included. We applied 1:3 propensity score matching to evaluate the association between prior therapeutic anticoagulation use and clinical outcome, with in hospital mortality as primary endpoint. 190 (16%) patients used therapeutic anticoagulation prior to admission. In the propensity score matched analyses, we observed no associations between prior use of therapeutic anticoagulation and overall mortality (RR 1.02 (95% CI; 0.80-1.30) or length of hospital stay (7.0 [4-12] vs 7.0 {4-12] days, p=0.69), although we observed a lower risk of pulmonary embolism (RR 0.19 (95% CI; 0.05-0.80). This study shows that prior use of therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with improved clinical outcome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.