Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has spread globally. Vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is anticipated to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, the safety of vaccines against COVID-19 is a cause for concern and uncertainty, which leads to vaccine hesitancy. There have been some self-reported questionnaire studies regarding adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination; however, adverse effects on the oral region are rare. In this report, we present one case of ulcers arising on the bilateral palate mucosa following COVID-19 vaccination, which was suspected to be an adverse effect of vaccination.

Dental implant treatment is a highly predictable therapy, but when potentially lethal symptoms or complications occur, dentists must remove the implant fixture. Recently, reports on antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw have increased in the field of dental implants, although the relationship between dental implant treatment and antiresorptive agents remains unclear. Here, we report a case of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw that developed after dental implant removal. A 67-year-old Japanese woman with a medical history of osteoporosis and 7 years of oral bisphosphonate treatment was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of painful right mandibular bone exposure. A family dentist removed the dental implants from the right mandible using a trephine drill without flap elevation in August 2016. However, the healing was impaired; she was referred to our hospital 3 months after the procedure. We performed a sequestrectomy of the mandible under general anesthesia. In conclusion, this patient's course has two important implications: First, the removal of dental implants from patients who are prescribed oral bisphosphonates for long durations can cause antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Second, meticulous procedures are required to prevent and treat the development of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after dental implant removal.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is considered to play a critical role in dental implant treatment. Although many complications, such as maxillary sinusitis and infection, are well known, few reports are available on the risk of surgical ciliated cyst following the procedure. Here, we report a case of surgical ciliated cyst following maxillary sinus floor augmentation. A 55-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our hospital because of alveolar bone atrophy in the bilateral maxilla. We performed bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique without covering the window. The Schneiderian membrane did not perforate during the operation. She returned to our hospital after 9 years due to swelling of the left buccal region. Computerized tomography revealed a well-defined radiolucent area with radiodense border intraosseously localized in the left maxilla. We performed enucleation of the cyst with the patient under general anesthesia. Histological examination of the specimen showed a surgical ciliated cyst. In conclusion, the course of this patient has 2 important implications. First, the sinus membrane entrapped in the grafted bone without visible perforation and or tearing can develop into a surgical ciliated cyst. Second, there is a possibility that covering the lateral window tightly might prevent the development of a surgical ciliated cyst.

Background The postoperative complications of mandibular fracture include malocclusion, infection, nonunion, osteomyelitis, and sensorial mental nerve dysfunction. However, there are no reports regarding postoperative dysphagia as a complication of mandibular fracture. Herein, we report a rare case of postoperative dysphagia caused by delayed mandibular fracture treatment in a patient with severe intellectual disability. Case presentation A 46-year-old Japanese male patient with severe intellectual disability fell down and struck his chin. The patient was referred to our department 10 days after the accident. Upon examination, he could not close his mouth because of severe left mandibular body fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed under general anesthesia 16 days after sustaining the injury, and normal occlusion was eventually achieved. However, the patient could not swallow well a day after surgery. He was then diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy of muscles for swallowing based on videoendoscopic examination findings. Adequate dysphagia rehabilitation could not be facilitated because of the patient’s mental status. Postoperative dysphagia did not improve 21 days after surgery. Therefore, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was required. Conclusions The treatment course of the patient had two important implications. First, postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy may occur if treatment is delayed in severe mandibular body fracture. Second, in particular, if a patient with severe intellectual disability develops postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy, adequate dysphagia rehabilitation cannot be facilitated, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy may be required. Therefore, early open reduction and internal fixation is required for mandibular fracture in a patient with severe intellectual disability.

No abstract