Purpose:The primary advantage of en bloc resection of bladder tumors is to provide better diagnostic accuracy. However, the clinical significance of horizontal and vertical margin has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the clinical importance of surgical margins in patients who underwent en bloc resection of bladder tumors.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the records of 140 consecutive patients who underwent en bloc resection of bladder tumors for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. We analyzed perioperative and oncological outcome, and compared patient demographics and recurrence-free survival for horizontal findings. The relationship between surgical margin and second transurethral resection outcome in pT1 bladder cancer was also analyzed.Results:Mean tumor diameter was 17.2±9.8 mm. Pathological stages were 93 cases in pTa and 47 cases in pT1. Diagnostic rates for the horizontal and vertical margins were 63% and 99%, respectively. The rates of sessile, carcinoma in situ, high grade, and pT1 tumors were significantly higher in the horizontal margin positive group (41) than in the negative group (47). There was no significant difference in 2-year recurrence-free survival based on horizontal margin findings (negative: 72.4%, positive: 75.4%, p=0.87). A second transurethral resection was performed in 31 of the 47 pT1 patients; pT1 residue was seen only in vertical margin positive cases, and 5 pTa/pTis residues at the transurethral resection scar were seen in 15 horizontal margin positive patients.Conclusions:Horizontal margin positive findings were not associated with recurrence-free survival, but careful assessment is warranted regarding residue at the original site. A second transurethral resection should be considered in patients with horizontal and vertical margin positive pT1 bladder cancer.

Early use of ARAT may improve OS, PFS, and PSA response in CRPC. Larger, prospective studies will be required to confirm our findings.

Background: Although prostate cancer is a very common form of malignancy in men, the clinical significance of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with abiraterone acetate versus the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide has not yet been verified in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).The present study was designed to initiate this verification in real-world Japanese clinical practice.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 312 patients with high-risk mHSPC based on LATITUDE criteria and had received ADT with bicalutamide (n = 212) or abiraterone acetate (n = 100) between September 2015 and December 2020. Bicalutamide was given at 80 mg daily and abiraterone was given at 1000 mg daily as four 250-mg tablets plus prednisolone (5-10 mg daily). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were compared. The prognostic factor for time to CRPC was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model.Results: Patients in the bicalutamide group were older, and more of them had poor performance status (≧2), than in the abiraterone group. Impaired liver function was noted in 2% of the bicalutamide group and 16% of the abiraterone group (p < 0.001).Median follow-up was 22.5 months for bicalutamide and 17 months for abiraterone (p < 0.001). Two-year OS and CSS for bicalutamide versus abiraterone was 77.8% versus 79.5% (p = 0.793) and 81.1% versus 82.5% (p = 0.698), respectively. Median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the abiraterone group than in the bicalutamide group (NA vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Gleason score ≧9, high alkaline phosphatase, high lactate dehydrogenase, liver metastasis, and

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) with ADT in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with focus on the effect of sequential therapy in a real-world clinical practice setting. Methods The records of 382 patients who harbored high-volume mHSPC, based on the CHAARTED criteria, and had received ADT with either docetaxel (n = 92) or NSAA (bicalutamide) (n = 290) were retrospectively analyzed. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient demographics. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and time to second-line progression (PFS2) were compared. 2nd-line PFS defined as the time from CRPC diagnosis to progression after second-line therapy was also compared. Results After matching, a total of 170 patients were retained: 85 patients treated with docetaxel + ADT and 85 patients treated with NSAA + ADT. The median OS and CSS for docetaxel + ADT versus NSAA + ADT were not reached (NR) vs. 49 months (p = 0.02) and NR vs. 55 months (p = 0.02), respectively. Median time to CRPC and PFS2 in patients treated with docetaxel + ADT was significantly longer compared to those treated with NSAA (22 vs. 12 months; p = 0.003 and, NR vs. 28 months; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in 2nd-line PFS between the two groups. Conclusions Our analysis suggested that ADT with docetaxel significantly prolonged OS and CSS owing to a better time to CRPC and PFS2 in comparison to NSAA + ADT in high-volume mHSPC.

138 Background: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a lethal disease subset with median overall survival of less than 1 year from time of detection. The treatment strategy against NEPC is not yet established and some clinical trials are ongoing now. Recently, clinical trial (RADIIANT4) showed that treatment with everolimus was associated with significant improvement in survival in patients with progressive lung or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. In this study we evaluated the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer and we tried to introduce everolimus against pathologically proven NEPC and investigated the clinical outcomes of this agent. Methods: Total of 193 prostate cancer cases were included in this study. We tested serum neuroendocrine markers, including (NSE and pro-GRP). And we evaluated positive rate of these markers. Eleven cases were pathologically proven neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) in this cohort. Seven out of eleven NEPC cases were introduced everolimus 10mg daily. We investigated the change of serum neuroendocrine markers (NSE and pro-GRP), radiologic examination and survival. Results: The positive rate of serum neuroendocrine markers (at least one of the markers increasing above normal limit) were 23.5% in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), 59.5% in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and 100% in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). There were significant differences in each other (HSPC vs. CRPC: p=0.0001, CRPC vs. NEPC: p=0.0109). We introduced everolimus in seven cases out of eleven NEPC cases. The median follow up period was 18 months. Neuroendocrine markers decreased in five of seven (71.4%) cases after introduction of everolimus. Median decreasing rate were 67.1% in NSE and 65.5% in pro GRP. 24M progression free survival rate was 57.1% and 24M overall survival rate was 57.1%. Conclusions: There is a possibility that the incidence of NEPC is higher than expected, and treatment against prostate adenocarcinoma accelerate neuroendocrine differentiation. Everolimus showed efficacy against NEPC. Although this study was retrospective and number of cases was limited, everolimus would be a one of the treatment options against NEPC.