Although hemihepatic portal vein embolization (PVE) has been used preoperatively to extend indications for hepatectomy in patients with colorectal metastases, the effects of this procedure on tumor growth and outcome remain controversial. To address this issue, we assessed the proliferative activity of intrahepatic metastases after PVE and the long-term outcome of this procedure. Eighteen patients with colorectal metastases underwent preoperative PVE between 1996 and 2000 (PVE group). Twenty-nine patients who underwent major hepatic resection without PVE served as control (non-PVE group). The hepatic parenchymal fraction of the left lobe had significantly increased from 38.1 ؎ 3.2% to 45.9 ؎ 2.9% 3 weeks after PVE (؉20.5%, P < .0001). Tumor volume and percent tumor volume had also significantly increased from 223 ؎ 89 mL to 270 ؎ 97 mL (؉20.8%, P ؍ .016) and from 13.7 ؎ 4.3% to 16.2 ؎ 4.9% (؉18.5%, P ؍ .014), respectively. There was no apparent correlation between the increase in parenchymal volume and that in tumor volume. The Ki-67 labeling index of metastatic lesions was 46.6 ؎ 7.2% in the PVE group and 35.4 ؎ 12.6% in the non-PVE group (P ؍ .013). Long-term survival was similar in the PVE and non-PVE groups, however, disease-free survival was significantly poorer in the PVE group than in the non-PVE group (P ؍ .004). We conclude that PVE increases tumor growth and probably is associated with enhanced recurrence of disease. Although PVE is effective in extending indications for surgery, patient selection for PVE should be cautious. (HEPATOLOGY 2001;34:267-272.)Hepatic resection provides the only chance for cure in patients with colorectal metastases. To extend indications for hepatectomy, hemihepatic portal vein embolization (PVE) has been performed in selected patients. 1-3 PVE induces homolateral atrophy of the portion of the liver scheduled for resection and contralateral compensatory hypertrophy of the remnant liver, thus decreasing the risk of postoperative liver failure. PVE is indicated when the remnant liver is expected to be very small, i.e., about 40% smaller than preoperative liver volume, or when tumor spread requires a right hemihepatectomy with partial resection of the left side of the liver. 4,5 The positive effects of PVE on hepatic function must be weighed against recent evidence suggesting that this procedure may promote oncogenesis. Elias et al., have reported that after PVE liver metastases may grow more rapidly than liver parenchyma. 6 This assumption was based on a study of only 5 patients who had tumors in the nonembolized lobe of the liver, rather than the embolized lobe. In addition, they focused on tumor growth in the nonembolized lobe. Consequently, their findings were considered too premature to warrant contraindication of PVE in patients with colorectal metastases. 7,8 When used in combination with arterial chemoembolization, PVE suppresses growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 9 Long-term results of HCC resection after PVE have recently been shown to be better than or...
To test the clinical usefulness of hepatic asialogycoprotein receptor analysis in liver surgery, we have conducted univariate and multivariate analysis for the detection of cirrhotic patients and prediction of morbidity after hepatic resection. Liver scintigraphy using technetium 99m-labeled asialoglycoprotein analog (TcGSA), ICG test, and CT hepatic volumetry were undertaken in 158 surgical patients including 111 who underwent hepatic resection. Hepatic functional parameters including Child-Pugh score, indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-R15), clearance index (HH15), receptor index (LHL15), receptor concentration ([R]0), total hepatic receptor amount (R0) and hepatic parenchymal volume (HPV) were compared among patients with normal, cirrhotic, and non-cirrhotic damaged liver. Preoperative hepatic functional parameters, resected parenchymal fraction (RPf), operative blood loss, and total receptor amount of the remnant liver (R0-remnant) were compared between patients with and without signs of postoperative liver failure. All parameters but HPV were significantly different among patients with normal, cirrhotic, and noncirrhotic damaged liver. The multivariate analysis selected two significant (p <0.05) parameters, [R]0 and Child-Pugh score for the detection of liver cirrhosis. Of the 111 patients who underwent resection, 14 developed transient signs of postoperative liver failure. Of the parameters tested, presence of liver cirrhosis, LHL15, R0, intraoperative blood loss, and R0-remnant were significantly different between patients with and without signs of postoperative liver failure (p <0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis selected only R0-remnant as a significant (p = 0.022) parameter for the prediction of liver failure. The morbidity rate in patients with R0-remnant under 0.05 mmoles was 100%, and the rate decreased in inverse proportion to R0-remnant. In conclusion, combining the ASGP-R concentration ([R]0) and the Child-Pugh score best detected liver cirrhosis in surgical candidates. Cirrhotic patients and patients with a low R0-remnant are at higher risk for postoperative liver failure. The present study confirms the usefulness of hepatic asialogycoprotein receptor analysis in liver surgery.
We retrospectively evaluated whether a surgical strategy benefits patients with operable lung metastasis of breast cancer. Between 1960 and 2000, 90 patients (mean age 55.1; range 32-77) with lung metastasis (79 solitary, 11 multiple) underwent surgery as follows: wedge resection (n = 10), segmental resection (n = 11), lobectomy (n = 68) and pneumonectomy (n = 1). The metastases were completely resected in 89% of them. One patient died due to surgical complications. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative overall survival rates were 54% and 40%, respectively (median, 6.3 years). Fifteen patients survived without relapse for over 10 years. They were 24% of those who progressed for 10 years or more after lung surgery. The most significant prognostic factor was disease-free interval (DFI) and stage at breast surgery. The 10-year survival rates of those with >==3 and <3 years of DFI were 47% and 26%, respectively (P = 0.014). Survival times were significantly longer for patients with clinical stage I at breast surgery than those with stage II-IV (P = 0.013). Our data, although limited and highly selective, suggest that surgical approach to lung metastasis from breast cancer may prolong survival in certain subgroups of patients to a greater extent than systemic chemotherapy alone. Surgical approach to lung metastasis of breast cancer, if possible, should be a treatment of choice to a great extent.
Breast cancer remains a common malignancy in women, but the take-up for breast cancer screening programs in Japan is still low, possibly due to its perceived inconvenience. TFF1 and TFF3 are expressed in both breast cancer tissue and normal breast. Serum trefoil proteins were reported as cancer screening markers for gastric, prostate, lung, pancreatic cancer and cholangio carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to examine whether serum trefoil proteins could be screening biomarkers for breast cancer. Serum trefoil proteins in 94 breast cancer patients and 84 health check females were measured by ELISA. Serum TFF1 and TFF3 were significantly higher and serum TFF2 was significantly lower in breast cancer patients. Area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic of TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3 was 0.69, 0.83, and. 0.72, respectively. AUC of the combination of TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3 was 0.96. Immunohistochemically, TFF1 expression was positive in 56.5% and TFF3 was positive in 73.9% of breast cancers, while TFF2 was negative in all tumors. Serum TFF1 had positive correlation with expression of TFF1 in breast cancer tissue. Serum concentrations of TFF1 and TFF3 but not TFF2 are higher in women with breast cancer than in women without breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.