Purpose: Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for developing nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, and continued smoking exposure after diagnosis may increase the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes. We compare self-reported vs biochemically verified nicotine exposure to determine the accuracy of self-report among recently diagnosed nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analysis consisted of 517 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients who contributed a urine or saliva specimen the same day as self-reporting their smoking, use of e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and whether they lived with a smoker. Cotinine, the primary metabolite of nicotine, was used as an objective biomarker of recent nicotine exposure. Results: The prevalence of high, low and no cotinine exposure was 13%, 54% and 33%, respectively. Overall, 7.3% of patients (38/517) reported being a current cigarette smoker, while 13% (65/517) had cotinine levels consistent with active smoking exposure. Of these 65 patients 27 denied current smoking, resulting in a sensitivity of self-reported current smoking of 58%. After considering other sources of nicotine exposure such as e-cigarettes, cigars, nicotine replacement therapy and living with a smoker, the sensitivity was higher, at 82%. Nearly all patients with low cotinine denied any smoking-related exposure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest either biochemical verification with cotinine or additional questions about other sources of nicotine are needed to accurately identify nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients who have smoking-related exposures. Accurate classification of active and passive smoking exposure is essential to allow clinicians to advise cessation and help researchers estimate the association between post-diagnosis smoking-related exposure and nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence risk.
To determine whether older breast cancer survivors score lower on neuropsychological tests compared to matched non-cancer controls and to test the hypotheses that survivors who were APOE ε4 carriers would have the lowest cognitive performance, but that smoking history would decrease the negative effect of ε4 on cognition. MethodsFemale breast cancer survivors who had been diagnosed and treated at age 60 or older and were 5 -15 year survivors (N=328) and age and education matched non-cancer controls (N=160) were assessed at enrollment and at 8, 16 and 24 month follow ups with standard neuropsychological and psychological assessments. Blood for APOE genotyping was collected and smoking history was assessed at enrollment. Participants were purposely recruited so that approximately 50% had a history of treatment with chemotherapy or no chemotherapy and approximately 50% had a smoking history. ResultsAfter adjusting for age, cognitive reserve, depression and fatigue, breast cancer survivors scored signi cantly lower on all domains of cognitive function. A signi cant two-way interaction demonstrated that the negative effect of ε4 on cognitive performance was stronger among survivors. A signi cant three-way interaction supported the hypothesis that smoking history had a protective effect on cognitive function in ε4 carriers that was more pronounced in the controls than the survivors. ConclusionsThe results support the long-term cognitive impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatments on older, disease-free survivors, particularly for ε4 carriers. The results also emphasize the importance of assessing smoking history when examining APOE and cognition and are an example of the complex interactions of age, genetics, health behaviors and disease history in determining cognitive function.
Introduction: Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is associated with poor sleep. This study examined the effects of acupuncture versus cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on serum BDNF and sleep outcomes in cancer survivors with insomnia. Methods: This was an exploratory analysis of a randomized clinical trial (n = 160) comparing acupuncture versus CBT-I for cancer survivors with insomnia. Interventions were delivered over 8 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and week 8. Serum BDNF was evaluated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sleep was evaluated with the insomnia severity index and consensus sleep diary. Pearson correlations between BDNF and sleep outcomes were calculated. Data analysis was limited to 87 survivors who provided serum samples. Results: Among 87 survivors, the mean age was 61.9 (SD: 11.4) years, 51.7% were women, and 24.1% were non-White. Mean serum BDNF did not significantly increase in acupuncture (n = 50) or CBT-I (n = 37) groups. When analysis was restricted to patients with low baseline BDNF (i.e. levels below the sample median of 47.1 ng/mL), the acupuncture group (n = 22) demonstrated a significant 7.2 ng/mL increase in mean serum BDNF (P = 0.03), whereas the CBT-I group (n = 21) demonstrated a non-significant 2.9 ng/mL increase (P = 0.28). Serum BDNF was not significantly correlated with sleep outcomes (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: Among cancer survivors with insomnia and low baseline BDNF, acupuncture significantly increased serum BDNF levels; however, the clinical significance of this finding requires further investigation. Trial registration no. NCT02356575 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Introduction We are conducting a multicenter study to identify classifiers predictive of disease-specific survival in patients with primary melanomas. Here we delineate the unique aspects, challenges, and best practices for optimizing a study of generally small-sized pigmented tumor samples including primary melanomas of at least 1.05mm from AJTCC TNM stage IIA-IIID patients. This ongoing study will target 1,000 melanomas within the international InterMEL consortium. We also evaluated tissue-derived predictors of extracted nucleic acids’ quality and success in downstream testing. Methods Following a pre-established protocol, participating centers ship formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for the centralized handling, dermatopathology review and histology-guided coextraction of RNA and DNA. Samples are distributed for evaluation of somatic mutations using next gen sequencing (NGS) with the MSK-IMPACT TM assay, methylation-profiling (array), and miRNA expression (Nanostring nCounter). Results Sufficient material was obtained for screening of miRNA expression in 683/685 (99%) eligible melanomas, methylation in 467 (68%), and somatic mutations in 560 (82%). In 446/685 (65%) cases, aliquots of RNA/DNA were sufficient for testing with all three platforms. Among samples evaluated by the time of this analysis, the mean NGS coverage was 249x, 59 (18.6%) samples had coverage below 100x, and 41/414 (10%) failed methylation QC due to low intensity probes or insufficient Meta-Mixed Interquartile (BMIQ)- and single sample (ss)- Noob normalizations. Six of 683 RNAs (1%) failed Nanostring QC due to the low proportion of probes above the minimum threshold. Age of the FFPE tissue blocks (p<0.001) and time elapsed from sectioning to co-extraction (p=0.002) were associated with methylation screening failures. Melanin reduced the ability to amplify fragments of 200bp or greater (absent/lightly pigmented vs heavily pigmented, p<0.003). Conversely, heavily pigmented tumors rendered greater amounts of RNA (p<0.001), and of RNA above 200 nucleotides (p<0.001). Conclusion Our experience with many archival tissues demonstrates that with careful management of tissue processing and quality control it is possible to conduct multi-omic studies in a complex multi-institutional setting for investigations involving minute quantities of FFPE tumors, as in studies of early-stage melanoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.