Coronaviruses have large positive-strand RNA genomes that are 5′ capped and 3′ polyadenylated. The 5′-terminal two-thirds of the genome contain two open reading frames (ORFs), 1a and 1b, that together make up the viral replicase gene and encode two large polyproteins that are processed by viral proteases into 15–16 nonstructural proteins, most of them being involved in viral RNA synthesis. ORFs located in the 3′-terminal one-third of the genome encode structural and accessory proteins and are expressed from a set of 5′ leader-containing subgenomic mRNAs that are synthesized by a process called discontinuous transcription. Coronavirus protein synthesis not only involves cap-dependent translation mechanisms but also employs regulatory mechanisms, such as ribosomal frameshifting. Coronavirus replication is known to affect cellular translation, involving activation of stress-induced signaling pathways, and employing viral proteins that affect cellular mRNA translation and RNA stability. This chapter describes our current understanding of the mechanisms involved in coronavirus mRNA translation and changes in host mRNA translation observed in coronavirus-infected cells.

The newly emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV (SARS-CoV) represent highly pathogenic human CoVs that share a property to inhibit host gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Similar to the nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) of SARS-CoV that inhibits host gene expression at the translational level, we report that MERS-CoV nsp1 also exhibits a conserved function to negatively regulate host gene expression by inhibiting host mRNA translation and inducing the degradation of host mRNAs. Furthermore, like SARS-CoV nsp1, the mRNA degradation activity of MERS-CoV nsp1, most probably triggered by its ability to induce an endonucleolytic RNA cleavage, was separable from its translation inhibitory function. Despite these functional similarities, MERS-CoV nsp1 used a strikingly different strategy that selectively targeted translationally competent host mRNAs for inhibition. While SARS-CoV nsp1 is localized exclusively in the cytoplasm and binds to the 40S ribosomal subunit to gain access to translating mRNAs, MERS-CoV nsp1 was distributed in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm and did not bind stably to the 40S subunit, suggesting a distinctly different mode of targeting translating mRNAs. Interestingly, consistent with this notion, MERS-CoV nsp1 selectively targeted mRNAs, which are transcribed in the nucleus and transported to the cytoplasm, for translation inhibition and mRNA degradation but spared exogenous mRNAs introduced directly into the cytoplasm or virus-like mRNAs that originate in the cytoplasm. Collectively, these data point toward a novel viral strategy wherein the cytoplasmic origin of MERS-CoV mRNAs facilitates their escape from the inhibitory effects of MERS-CoV nsp1. (1) and has spread to several other countries in the Middle East, North Africa, Europe, and Asia. MERS-CoV appears to have originated in bats (2), while accumulating evidence has also pointed to the dromedary camels as the potential animal reservoir (3, 4). MERS-CoV infection generally causes fever, cough, and pneumonia, leading to respiratory failure, and the reported case fatality rate is ϳ40%. Some MERS patients develop acute renal failure. MERS-CoV can be transmitted from person to person (5-7), and many cases have occurred in persons with chronic underlying medical conditions or immunosuppression (8). The mechanisms governing the virulence and pathogenesis of MERSCoV are largely unknown (9).Upon entry into host cells, CoV genome expression is initiated by the translation of two large precursor polyproteins, pp1a and pp1ab, which are processed by viral proteinases into 15 to 16 mature proteins; the alpha and beta CoVs encodes 16 mature nonstructural proteins (nsp1 to nsp16), while the gamma and delta CoVs lack nsp1, the most N-terminal cleavage product, and encode only 15 nsp's (10-12). While many of these proteins play an Citation Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Nakagawa K, Terasaki K, Ramirez SI, Tseng CK, Makino S. 2015. Middle East respiratory syndrome coro...

We have reported a novel bovine rotavirus, the AzuK-1 (G21P [29]) strain, isolated from an asymptomatic calf. We isolated another bovine rotavirus, the Dai-10 strain, bearing new G24P [33] genotypes, assigned by the Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG), from an asymptomatic cow in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan in 2007. To gain an insight into the origins and evolution of these strains, we determined the complete ORF sequences of all 11 genes of the two strains. The NSP3 genes of both strains were confirmed to belong to a new NSP3 genotype, T9, by the RCWG. Genotype determination of AzuK-1 and Dai-10 strains revealed that eight gene segments of both strains possessed genotypes typically observed in bovine rotaviruses, with the exception of VP4, VP7 and NSP3 gene segments. Unexpectedly, phylogenetic analyses showed that VP6 and NSP2 gene segments of the AzuK-1 and Dai-10 strains were clustered with those of simian or canine/feline rotaviruses, rather than with those of bovine rotaviruses. These findings indicate the possibility that both strains originated by interspecies transmission and multiple reassortment events involving bovine, simian and canine/feline rotaviruses, resulting in the introduction of some genes into the genetic background of bovine rotaviruses. INTRODUCTIONGroup A rotaviruses are the major pathogens causing acute gastroenteritis in infants and a wide range of animals, including birds. Rotavirus-induced diarrhoea is a serious public health problem worldwide, responsible for more than 600 000 child deaths each year (Parashar et al., 2006). Likewise, in domestic animals, rotavirus-induced diarrhoea is a major problem causing significant economic losses (Dhama et al., 2009;Martella et al., 2010).Rotaviruses are members of the family Reoviridae. Rotaviruses possess a genome of 11 segments of dsRNA, which encode six viral structural proteins (VP1-VP4, VP6 and VP7) and six non-structural proteins (NSP1-NSP6). Because of the segmented nature of the genome, a reassortment event can occur in cells co-infected with two or more different strains (Estes & Kapikian, 2007;Palombo, 2002;Ramig, 1997). The rotavirus virion is a triple-layered icosahedral particle. The outer capsid is composed of VP7 and VP4. They elicit neutralizing antibodies independently. In a dual classification system, rotaviruses are classified into 24 G genotypes and 32 P genotypes based on the nucleotide sequences of VP7 and VP4 genes, respectively (Collins et al., 2010; Esona et al., 2010;Matthijnssens et al., 2006Matthijnssens et al., , 2008a Schumann et al., 2009; Solberg et al., 2009;Ursu et al., 2009). Recently, a new classification system has been established using nucleotide sequences of all of the 11 genomic RNA segments by the Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG) (Matthijnssens et al., 2008b). In this system, the The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AB513836-AB513838 and AB573070-AB573086.Supplementary material is available with the online version of this paper. , 2...

The fixed rabies virus (RV) strain Nishigahara kills adult mice after intracerebral inoculation, whereas the chicken embryo fibroblast cell-adapted strain Ni-CE causes nonlethal infection in adult mice. We previously reported that the chimeric CE(NiP) strain, which has the phosphoprotein (P protein) gene from the Nishigahara strain in the genetic background of the Ni-CE strain, causes lethal infection in adult mice, indicating that the P gene is responsible for the different pathogenicities of the Nishigahara and Ni-CE strains. Previous studies demonstrated that RV P protein binds to the interferon (IFN)-activated transcription factor STAT1 and blocks IFN signaling by preventing its translocation to the nucleus. In this study, we examine the molecular mechanism by which RV P protein determines viral pathogenicity by comparing the IFN antagonist activities of the Nishigahara and Ni-CE P proteins. The results, obtained from both RV-infected cells and cells transfected to express P protein only, show that Ni-CE P protein is significantly impaired for its capacity to block IFN-activated STAT1 nuclear translocation and, consequently, inhibits IFN signaling less efficiently than Nishigahara P protein. Further, it was demonstrated that a defect in the nuclear export of Ni-CE P protein correlates with a defect in its ability to cause the mislocalization of STAT1. These data provide the first evidence that the capacity of the RV P protein to inhibit STAT1 nuclear translocation and IFN signaling correlates with the viral pathogenicity.The host immune response to viral infection is a key factor in defining viral pathogenicity and the outcome of the infection. This depends not only on the capacity of the host to mount an innate and/or adaptive immune response against the virus but also on the ability of the virus to evade/subvert this response (22).The principal response of host cells to viral infection is the production of type I interferons (IFNs) (including alpha interferon [IFN-␣] and IFN-␤), which, on binding to IFN receptors on the cell surface, activate the JAK/STAT intracellular signaling pathway that culminates in the phosphorylation, heterodimerization, and nuclear translocation of the transcription factors signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT2. In the context of a complex called IFNstimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3), the activated STATs bind to promoters in the DNA that contain an IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) sequence, resulting in the transcription of a plethora of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) encoding antiviral proteins which act to establish the antiviral state in cells (reviewed in reference 22).To propagate efficiently in host cells, viruses have had to evolve multiple strategies to dampen the host IFN system, which appear to involve the expression of viral proteins with IFN antagonist functions. These IFN antagonists are reported to exert their effect by a variety of mechanisms, reflecting the diversity of host antiviral responses, but the STATs are known as common targ...

Stress granule (SG) formation is generally triggered as a result of stress-induced translation arrest. The impact of SG formation on virus replication varies among different viruses, and the significance of SGs in coronavirus (CoV) replication is largely unknown. The present study examined the biological role of SGs in Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV replication. The MERS-CoV 4a accessory protein is known to inhibit SG formation in cells in which it was expressed by binding to double-stranded RNAs and inhibiting protein kinase R (PKR)-mediated phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α). Replication of MERS-CoV lacking the genes for 4a and 4b (MERS-CoV-Δp4), but not MERS-CoV, induced SG accumulation in MERS-CoV-susceptible HeLa/CD26 cells, while replication of both viruses failed to induce SGs in Vero cells, demonstrating cell type-specific differences in MERS-CoV-Δp4-induced SG formation. MERS-CoV-Δp4 replicated less efficiently than MERS-CoV in HeLa/CD26 cells, and inhibition of SG formation by small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of the SG components promoted MERS-CoV-Δp4 replication, demonstrating that SG formation was detrimental for MERS-CoV replication. Inefficient MERS-CoV-Δp4 replication was not due to either the induction of type I and type III interferons or the accumulation of viral mRNAs in the SGs. Rather, it was due to the inefficient translation of viral proteins, which was caused by high levels of PKR-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation and likely by the confinement of various factors that are required for translation in the SGs. Finally, we established that deletion of the 4a gene alone was sufficient for inducing SGs in infected cells. Our study revealed that 4a-mediated inhibition of SG formation facilitates viral translation, leading to efficient MERS-CoV replication. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes respiratory failure with a high case fatality rate in patients, yet effective antivirals and vaccines are currently not available. Stress granule (SG) formation is one of the cellular stress responses to virus infection and is generally triggered as a result of stress-induced translation arrest. SGs can be beneficial or detrimental for virus replication, and the biological role of SGs in CoV infection is unclear. The present study showed that the MERS-CoV 4a accessory protein, which was reported to block SG formation in cells in which it was expressed, inhibited SG formation in infected cells. Our data suggest that 4a-mediated inhibition of SG formation facilitates the translation of viral mRNAs, resulting in efficient virus replication. To our knowledge, this report is the first to show the biological significance of SG in CoV replication and provides insight into the interplay between MERS-CoV and antiviral stress responses.