Background We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer who received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). Methods A retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015 to 2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Results The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.23, 95% CI = 3.60–5.00). During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients. Intensive EOL care in the last 30 days of life is more probable among patients in the SACT group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58, 95% CI = 2.54–5.04, p < 0.001), especially in those with a stage IV disease (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.31–2.71, p = 0.001). In the SACT group 6.7 and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. Conclusions Significant proportion of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results reflect current patterns of EOL care for patients with lung cancer in Estonia. Availability of palliative care and hospice services must be increased to improve resource use and patient-oriented care.
We aimed to study differences in the use of health care resources in relation to time before death in patients with advanced lung cancer who either received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) or were ineligible for SACT. A retrospective cohort of lung cancer patients (N = 778) diagnosed with advanced disease at North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015–2017 was linked to population-based health care data. We calculated a composite measure of cumulative resource use, comprised from the following: outpatient care, emergency department (ED) visit, inpatient care, admission to intensive care unit, nursing care and prescriptions. Costs were highest in patients who received SACT in the last month before death and decreased in parallel with the time elapsed from the last SACT. Only 20% of SACT patients received nursing care in the final month of life. The no-SACT patients had less time covered by health care services per month, and large differences were seen in the type of service received by the study groups. The largest contributor of health care costs at end of life was acute inpatient care, including approximately 10% of patients who died on the same day as or day following the emergency department visit. These results demonstrate the low nursing care and hospice utilization rates in Estonia.
Background: We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer who received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015–2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Results: The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR]=4.23, 95% CI=3.60-5.00). In the SACT group 6.7% and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients (p < 0.001). Among SACT patients, sepsis, bacterial infection and/or neutropenia had a significant adverse effect on survival (HR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3-2.21, p < 0.001), whereas the use of the granulocyte colony stimulating growth factor reduced the risk of death (HR= 0.71, 95% CI=0.54-0.92, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Significant proportions of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results highlight that neutropenia and infectious complications are still the primary cause of early SACT-related death.
Background: We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer assigned to systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). Methods: A retrospective cohort of lung cancer patients, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015–2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Results: The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR]=4.23, 95% CI=3.60-5.00). In the SACT group 6.7% and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients (p < 0.001). Among SACT patients, sepsis, bacterial infection and/or neutropenia had a significant adverse effect on survival (HR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3-2.21, p < 0.001), whereas the use of the granulocyte colony stimulating growth factor reduced the risk of death (HR= 0.71, 95% CI=0.55-0.93, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Significant proportions of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results highlight that neutropenia and infectious complications are still the primary cause of early SACT-related death.
Background: We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer who received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). Methods: A retrospective cohort of lung cancer patients, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015–2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Results: The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR]=4.23, 95% CI=3.60-5.00). In the SACT group 6.7% and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients (p < 0.001). Among SACT patients, sepsis, bacterial infection and/or neutropenia had a significant adverse effect on survival (HR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3-2.21, p < 0.001), whereas the use of the granulocyte colony stimulating growth factor reduced the risk of death (HR= 0.71, 95% CI=0.54-0.92, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Significant proportions of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results highlight that neutropenia and infectious complications are still the primary cause of early SACT-related death.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.