The feeding ecology of Dotterel Charadrius morinellus adults and chicks was studied on three Scottish breeding areas. On the basis of 2324 prey items identified from 234 faeces, we show that (i) birds feed selectively and (ii) age‐related and seasonal differences in food selection occur. The diet comprised mainly beetles (Coleoptera), sawflies (Symphyta) and the adults and larvae of Tipula montana. The faeces of adult Dotterel contained a high proportion of beetles, whereas chick faeces had more soft‐bodied prey. However, when T. montana adults emerged en masse (every second year) both adults and chicks took more tipulids. On one area, larval T. montana comprised much of the diet soon after the birds arrived on their breeding grounds and just before leaving in autumn. The preferred feeding habitats were flat or gently sloping Racomitrium lanuginosum or Juncus trifidus heaths or the transition zone between moss heath and montane bog. Dwarf‐shrub, grass‐dominated and single bog communities were avoided. The preferred feeding habitats were those in which pitfall trap catches of the main prey were highest. A close juxtaposition of montane bog and R. lanuginosum heaths met the feeding requirements of both chicks and adults, respectively. Recent changes in the breeding distribution of Dotterel in Britain may be related to de‐ terioration in feeding and breeding habitat due to overgrazing by sheep and greater habitat acidification.

Body mass loss is frequently observed in breeding birds: whether this is an adaptive response to a change in the relative value of body stores and locomotion performance or a consequence of energetic constraint is still in debate. The male alone cares for most nests of the Eurasian dotterel Charadrius morinellus, although females assist at a proportion of nests. Energetic costs are probably high in the dotterel's arctic‐alpine environment and uniparental care restricts the foraging time available to meet these costs, so that incubating dotterel may have to fuel themselves partly using body stores. Nesting male dotterel lost 7.8% of their mass through the incubation period but were 6.8% heavier during periods of high food abundance. Males that were assisted in incubation by a female were 6.7% heavier than uniparental males. We conclude that, since dotterel were heavier when energetic constraints were lifted, mass loss through incubation was principally a consequence of energetic constraint, rather than adaptive mass optimisation.

No abstract

No abstract

Red‐breasted Mergansers Mergus serrator were counted in the river North Esk, Scotland, and on the sea nearby, 1987–1990. Pairs arrived at the river estuary from early winter, but the main influx to freshwater took place in late April and in May, when breeding pairs dispersed far upriver. Females began incubation from late May. Most young hatched in July and fledged by late September. Males left the river in June and congregated at an offshore moulting site, their numbers peaking in August, and dispersed rapidly in September. Breeding density and total duckling production decreased with increasing distance upstream, decreasing river width and increasing gradient and elevation. The total number of breeding pairs and their distribution on the river were similar from year to year, despite variable numbers killed, suggesting a stable breeding population near the upper limit the habitat would support in those years. It also suggested that killing mergansers in April was an ineffective way to reduce the population. The spatial variation in merganser breeding density was not correlated with the density of their main spring food, parr of salmon Salmo salar, but could have been related to its availability. The production of well‐grown ducklings varied annually and was inversely correlated with river flow during the main period of hatch. It is argued that Red‐breasted Mergansers breed late in the year because the hatching of ducklings in July coincides with an abundance of their food, large aquatic invertebrates and tiny juvenile fish.