Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases utilise reducing agents within the biomass substrate to act synergistically with canonical hydrolases to enhance cellulose deconstruction.
BackgroundCellulose amorphogenesis, described as the non-hydrolytic “opening up” or disruption of a cellulosic substrate, is becoming increasingly recognized as one of the key steps in the enzymatic deconstruction of cellulosic biomass when used as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals production. Although this process is thought to play a major role in facilitating hydrolysis, the lack of quantitative techniques capable of accurately describing the molecular-level changes occurring in the substrate during amorphogenesis has hindered our understanding of this process.ResultsIn this work, techniques for measuring changes in cellulose accessibility are reviewed and a new quantitative assay method is described. Carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs) with specific affinities for crystalline (CBM2a) or amorphous (CBM44) cellulose were used to track specific changes in the surface morphology of cotton fibres during amorphogenesis. The extents of phosphoric acid-induced and Swollenin-induced changes to cellulose accessibility were successfully quantified using this technique.ConclusionsThe adsorption of substructure-specific CBMs can be used to accurately quantify the extent of changes to cellulose accessibility induced by non-hydrolytic disruptive proteins. The technique provided a quick, accurate and quantitative measure of the accessibility of cellulosic substrates. Expanding the range of CBMs used for adsorption studies to include those specific for such compounds as xylan or mannan should also allow for the accurate quantitative tracking of the accessibility of these and other polymers within the lignocellulosic biomass matrix.
A key limitation in the overall hydrolysis process is the restricted access that the hydrolytic enzymes have due to the macro-and-micro structure of cellulose and its association with hemicellulose and lignin. Previous work has shown that several non-hydrolytic proteins can disrupt cellulose structure and boost the activity of hydrolytic enzymes when purer forms of cellulose are used. In the work reported here, Swollenin primarily disrupted the hemicellulosic fraction of pretreated corn stover, resulting in the solubilisation of monomeric and oligomeric sugars. Although Swollenin showed little synergism when combined with the cellulase monocomponents exoglucanase (CEL7A) and endoglucanase (CEL5A), it showed pronounced synergism with xylanase monocomponents Xylanase GH10 and Xylanase GH11, resulting in the release of significantly more xylose (>300%). It appears that Swollenin plays a role in amorphogenesis and that its primary action is enhancing access to the hemicellulose fraction that limits or masks accessibility to the cellulose component of lignocellulosic substrates.
Effective enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose requires the synergistic action of a suite of cellulase components. Most previous studies have only assessed cellulase synergism on model cellulosic substrates. When the actions of individual and combinations of cellulases (Cel7A, Cel6A, Cel7B, Cel5A) were assessed on various pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, Cel7A was shown to be the major contributor to overall cellulose hydrolysis, with the other enzymes synergistically enhancing its hydrolytic efficiency, at least partially, by facilitating Cel7A desorption (assessed by a double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). When the influences of various substrate physicochemical characteristics on the effectiveness of enzyme synergism were assessed, a strong relationship was observed between cellulose accessibility (as determined by the cellulose binding module technique) and the degree of synergism, with greater synergy observed on the more disorganized/accessible cellulose surface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.