Developmental surveillance is the process of monitoring child development over time to promote healthy development and to identify possible problems. Standardized developmental screeners have greater sensitivity than milestone-based history taking. Unfortunately, Canadian screening guidelines, to date, are sparse, logistical barriers to implementation have slowed uptake of screening tests and physicians continue to rely on milestones. When using clinical impression as a framework for surveillance, clinicians may not know when to consider a milestone delayed because developmental attainments exist within an age range and there is an absence of referenced percentiles on available published tables, which are particularly problematic for the cognitive and social-emotional sectors, which are less familiar to physicians. A novel, five-sector milestone framework with upper limits, referenced to the best available level of evidence, is presented. This framework may be used in teaching and may help physicians to better recognize failed milestones to facilitate early identification of children at risk for developmental disorders.

The cumulative risk of seizures and epilepsy was investigated in a prospectively identified cohort of 221 children with mental retardation (MR) born between 1951 and 1955 in Aberdeen, Scotland. By age 22 years, 33 (15%) had epilepsy. An additional 16 (7%) had had at least one seizure, but did not meet the criteria for epilepsy. The cumulative risk of epilepsy was 9, 11, 13, and 15% at 5, 10, 15, and 22 years, respectively. In children with MR and no associated disabilities, the cumulative risk of epilepsy was only 2.6, 3.2, 3.9, and 5.2% at 5, 10, 15, and 22 years. In children with MR and cerebral palsy (CP), the cumulative risk was 28, 31, and 38% at 5, 10, and 22 years. Children with a postnatal injury associated with MR had a cumulative risk of epilepsy of 53, 66, and 66% at 5, 10, and 15 years after the injury. By age 22 years, 39% had achieved 5-year seizure-free remission, including 56% of children with MR without associated disability, 47% of children with MR and CP, and 11% of children with a postnatal injury. We conclude that, in the absence of associated disability or postnatal injury, the risk of epilepsy in the retarded population is low. Epilepsy in this population also will frequently enter remission in later life.

The EEG in childhood epilepsy with occipital paroxysms (CEOP) was termed "distinctive" by Gastaut (1985) and Talwar et al. (1992) and "characteristic" by Herranz Tanarro et al. (1984), which suggests that the EEG is specific and diagnostic for CEOP. However, this hypothesis has been challenged (Newton and Aicardi, 1983; Beaumanoir and Grandjean, 1987). To test this, we reviewed 5,291 EEG reports made in 5 1/2 years in the only tertiary pediatric center in Newfoundland and Labrador. We identified 31 children who had one or more EEGs with occipital spike/sharp waves showing suppression of discharges with eye opening and normal background activity. Six had CEOP, 17 had benign nocturnal childhood occipital epilepsy, 5 had symptomatic epilepsy, 3 had unusual complex partial seizures (CPS), 4 had only provoked seizures, and 2 had no definite seizures. Overlap between seizure types was common. The EEG criteria for CEOP are not very specific.