Weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids did not reduce composite neonatal morbidity compared with a single course of treatment. Weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids should not be routinely prescribed for women at risk of preterm delivery.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects up to 25% of pregnant women and increases the risk of a number of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. There are 2 screening approaches for GDM: 1-step screening preferred by the American Diabetes Association and 2-step screening recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The 1-step approach from the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) involves a 2-hour, fasting oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); the 2-step Carpenter-Coustan approach involves an initial, nonfasting, 1-hour glucose test, followed by a 3-hour fasting OGTT, if the first test result is positive. The aim of this study was to compare the 2 screening approaches for GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes.This was a randomized trial, including data from all pregnant women who received care from Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Kaiser Permanente Hawaii. The women were randomly assigned to receive the 1-step approach or the 2-step approach during their first prenatal visit. Randomization occurred at both sites from May 28, 2014, to December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were GDM diagnosis; large for gestational age (birth weight > 90th percentile); perinatal composite outcome that included stillbirth, neonatal death, shoulder dystocia, bone fracture, or nerve palsy related to a birth injury; cesarean delivery; and gestational hypertension or preeclampsia.A total of 23,792 were randomized into the 1-step approach (with 66% being adherent) and 2-step approach (with 92% being adherent). The 1-step approach diagnosed GDM in 16.5% of women and the 2-step approach diagnosed GDM in 8.5% (relative risk [RR], 1.94; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-2.11). Comparing the 1-step approach with the 2-step approach, there were no significant differences on outcomes for large-for-gestational-age infants (8.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.