The compact 3T MRI system has been in continuous operation at the Mayo Clinic since March 2016. To date, over 200 patient studies have been completed, including 96 comparison studies with a clinical 3T whole-body MRI. The increased gradient performance has reliably resulted in consistently improved image quality.

Purpose To develop a highly efficient magnetic field gradient coil for head imaging that achieves 200 mT/m and 500 T/m/s on each axis using a standard 1 MVA gradient driver in clinical whole‐body 3.0T MR magnet. Methods A 42‐cm inner diameter head‐gradient used the available 89‐ to 91‐cm warm bore space in a whole‐body 3.0T magnet by increasing the radial separation between the primary and the shield coil windings to 18.6 cm. This required the removal of the standard whole‐body gradient and radiofrequency coils. To achieve a coil efficiency ~4× that of whole‐body gradients, a double‐layer primary coil design with asymmetric x‐y axes, and symmetric z‐axis was used. The use of all‐hollow conductor with direct fluid cooling of the gradient coil enabled ≥50 kW of total heat dissipation. Results This design achieved a coil efficiency of 0.32 mT/m/A, allowing 200 mT/m and 500 T/m/s for a 620 A/1500 V driver. The gradient coil yielded substantially reduced echo spacing, and minimum repetition time and echo time. In high b = 10,000 s/mm2 diffusion, echo time (TE) < 50 ms was achieved (>50% reduction compared with whole‐body gradients). The gradient coil passed the American College of Radiology tests for gradient linearity and distortion, and met acoustic requirements for nonsignificant risk operation. Conclusions Ultra‐high gradient coil performance was achieved for head imaging without substantial increases in gradient driver power in a whole‐body 3.0T magnet after removing the standard gradient coil. As such, any clinical whole‐body 3.0T MR system could be upgraded with 3‐4× improvement in gradient performance for brain imaging.

Purpose To design, build and characterize the performance of a novel 3T, 31 channel breast coil. Methods A flexible breast coil, accommodating all breast sizes while preserving close to unity filling factors in all configurations, was designed and built. Its performance was compared to the performance of the current state-of-the-art, 16 channel breast coil (Sentinelle coil, Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA), in phantoms and in vivo. Results Better axilla coverage and lower inter-coil coupling (12% vs. 26%, as characterized by the average off-diagonal elements of the noise correlation matrix) was exhibited by our 31 channel coil compared to the 16 channel coil. Breast area SNR increases of 68% (phantom) and 28 ± 31% (in vivo) were demonstrated in the 3 volunteers studied when the 31 channel coil was used. For the 31 channel/16 channel arrays, respectively, two dimensional acceleration factors of L/R × S/I = 4.3 × 2.4 resulted in average g-factors of 1.10/1.68 (in vitro) and 1.28/2.75 (in vivo); acceleration factors of L/R × A/P = 3.0 × 2.8 resulted in average g-factors of 1.06/1.54 (in vitro) and 1.05/1.12 (in vivo). Conclusion A high performance breast coil was built; its capabilities were demonstrated in phantom and normal volunteer imaging experiments.