No abstract

Study Design: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: This study aims to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of patient-reported outcome measures after spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Summary of Background Data: Radiographic correction of scoliosis is extensively reported in the literature but there is a need to study the impact of spinal fusion on patient-reported outcome measures. Prior reviews lacked homogeneity in outcome measures, did not perform quantitative meta-analysis of pooled effect size, or interpret the results in light of minimally clinically important difference thresholds. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of medical databases identified all studies that prospectively reported Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire data after spinal fusion for AIS. We screened 2314 studies for eligibility. Studies were included that reported preoperative and postoperative data at 24- or >60-month follow-up. Studies were excluded that failed to report means and SDs which were needed to calculate Cohen d effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals in estimating the magnitude and precision of the effect. Results: A total of 7 studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion in quantitative meta-analysis of effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Patients report large improvements in total score, self-image, and satisfaction; and moderate improvements in pain, function and mental health at 2 and 5 years after spinal fusion for AIS. All domains showed statistically significant improvement at all times except function at >60 months. All domains surpassed the minimally clinically important difference at all times except mental health. Conclusions: Moderate evidence suggests that spinal fusion improves quality of life for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in medium and long-term follow-up. Our results may help inform patient expectations regarding surgery. OCEMB Level of Evidence: Level I—systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

This study provides the surgeon with meaningful data on average cartilage depths at common donor sites in the knee and recipient sites in the elbow.