Proanthocyanidins (PAs) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) are found mainly in berries, and their content and degree of polymerization are important for the mouth feel of red wine. However, the mechanism of PA polymerization in grapevine remains unclear. Previous studies in the model legume Medicago truncatula showed that 4b-(S-cysteinyl)-epicatechin (Cys-EC) is an epicatechintype extension unit for nonenzymatic PA polymerization, and that leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR) converts Cys-EC into epicatechin starter unit to control PA extension. Grapevine possesses two LAR genes, but their functions are not clear. Here, we show that both Cys-EC and 4b-(S-cysteinyl)-catechin (Cys-C) are present in grapevine. Recombinant VvLAR1 and VvLAR2 convert Cys-C and Cys-EC into (1)-catechin and (2)-epicatechin, respectively, in vitro. The kinetic parameters of VvLARs are similar, with both enzymes being more efficient with Cys-C than with Cys-EC, the 2,3-cis conformation of which results in steric hindrance in the active site. Both VvLARs also produce (1)-catechin from leucocyanidin, and an inactive VvLAR2 allele reported previously is the result of a single amino acid mutation in the N terminus critical for all NADPH-dependent activities of the enzyme. VvLAR1 or VvLAR2 complement the M. truncatula lar:ldox double mutant that also lacks the leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) required for epicatechin starter unit formation, resulting in increased soluble PA levels, decreased insoluble PA levels, and reduced levels of Cys-C and Cys-EC when compared to the double mutant, and the appearance of catechin, epicatechin, and PA dimers characteristic of the ldox single mutant in young pods. These data advance our knowledge of PA building blocks and LAR function and provide targets for grapevine breeding to alter PA composition.

No abstract

Proanthocyanidins (PAs) and anthocyanins are two vital groups of flavonoid compounds for grape berries and red wines. Several transcription factors (TFs) have been identified to be involved in regulating PA and anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries. However, research on TFs with different regulatory mechanisms for these two biosynthesis branches in grapes remains limited. In this study, we identified an R2R3-MYB TF, VviMYB86, whose spatiotemporal gene expression pattern in grape berries coincided well with PA accumulation but contrasted with anthocyanin synthesis. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments verified that VviMYB86 positively regulated PA biosynthesis, primarily by upregulating the expression of the two leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR) genes in the Arabidopsis protoplast system, as well as in VviMYB86-overexpressing grape callus cultured under 24 h of darkness. Moreover, VviMYB86 was observed to repress the anthocyanin biosynthesis branch in grapes by downregulating the transcript levels of VviANS and VviUFGT. Overall, VviMYB86 is indicated to have a broad effect on flavonoid synthesis in grape berries. The results of this study will help elucidate the regulatory mechanism governing the expression of the two LAR genes in grape berries and provide new insights into the regulation of PA and anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries.