BACKGROUND: Blood group single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping probes for a limited range of polymorphisms. This study investigated whether massively parallel sequencing (also known as next-generation sequencing), with a targeted exome strategy, provides an extended blood group genotype and the extent to which massively parallel sequencing correctly genotypes in homologous gene systems, such as RH and MNS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donor samples(n 5 28) that were extensively phenotyped and genotyped using single nucleotide polymorphism typing, were analyzed using the TruSight One Sequencing Panel and MiSeq platform. Genes for 28 protein-based blood group systems, GATA1, and KLF1 were analyzed. Copy number variation analysis was used to characterize complex structural variants in the GYPC and RH systems. RESULTS:The average sequencing depth per target region was 66.2 6 39.8. Each sample harbored on average 43 6 9 variants, of which 10 6 3 were used for genotyping. For the 28 samples, massively parallel sequencing variant sequences correctly matched expected sequences based on single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data. Copy number variation analysis defined the Rh C/c alleles and complex RHD hybrids. Hybrid RHD*D-CE-D variants were correctly identified, but copy number variation analysis did not confidently distinguish between D and CE exon deletion versus rearrangement. CONCLUSION:The targeted exome sequencing strategy employed extended the range of blood group genotypes detected compared with single nucleotide polymorphism typing. This single-test format included detection of complex MNS hybrid cases and, with copy number variation analysis, defined RH hybrid genes along with the RHCE*C allele hitherto difficult to resolve by variant detection. The approach is economical compared with whole-genome sequencing and is suitable for a red blood cell reference laboratory setting.H uman blood group antigens are of significance in transfusion medicine, because patients who have made antibodies to red blood cell antigens are at risk of being affected by hemolytic transfusion reactions after the transfusion of incompatible blood. The International Society of Blood Transfusion has defined 36 blood group systems and over 350 blood group antigens.1 Different blood group systems exhibit varying degrees of antigen polymorphism, and the clinical significance of red blood cell antibodies also varies. [2][3][4] As a minimum requirement in blood transfusion safety, all blood donors are screened for ABO and the D antigen as well as for blood group antibodies known to be clinically significant. 5The majority of antigens are missense mutations and a consequence of single nucleotide variants (SNVs); however, genetic variations, such as insertions/deletions and splice-site variants, have a qualitative and/or quantitative impact on antigen expression. Blood group systems, such as RH and MNS, exhibit an additional layer of genetic variation. These arise because each system comprises homologous genes in which gene crossover or g...

BACKGROUND Blood donors whose red blood cells (RBCs) exhibit a partial RhD phenotype, lacking some D epitopes, present as D+ in routine screening. Such phenotypes can exhibit low‐frequency antigens (LFAs) of clinical significance. The aim of this study was to describe the serologic and genetic profile for a blood donor with an apparent D+ phenotype carrying a variant RHD gene where D Exons 5 and 6 are replaced by RHCE Exon (5‐6). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Anti‐D monoclonal antibodies were used to characterize the presentation of RhD epitopes on the RBCs. RHD exon scanning and DNA sequencing of short‐ and long‐range polymerase chain reaction amplicons were used to determine the RHD structure and sequence. Extended phenotyping for LFAs RH23 (DW) and Rh32 was performed. RESULTS The donor serology profile was consistent with partial RhD epitope presentation. The donor was hemizygous for an RHD variant allele described as RHD*D‐CE(5‐6)‐D hybrid. The RHCE gene insert is at least 3.868 kb with 5′ and 3′ breakpoints between IVS4 + 132–c.667 and IVS6 + 1960–IVS6 + 2099, respectively. The sequence for this hybrid was assigned GenBank Accession Number KT099190.2. The RBCs were RH23 (DW)+ and Rh32–. CONCLUSION A novel RHD*D‐CE(5‐6)‐D hybrid allele encodes a partial RhD epitope and carries the LFA RH23 (DW). This and the epitope profile resemble the partial DVa phenotype. Given that RBCs from this individual lack some RhD epitopes, there is an alloimmunization risk if the donor is exposed to D+ RBCs. Conversely, transfusions of RH23 (DW)+ cells to RH23 (DW)– recipients also pose an alloimmunization risk.

The Jk(a−b−) phenotype is rare. Individuals with the Jk null phenotype are at risk of developing anti-Jk3. Anti-Jk3 can cause both acute and delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions, as well as possible haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. The presence of anti-

No abstract