with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p <.000001). ORR was 8.9% and 2.7% (p = .010), and the disease control rate was 54.4% and 31.7% (p <.001) with abemaciclib and erlotinib, respectively. Safety results reflected the known safety profiles of abemaciclib and erlotinib. Conclusions: In this study, the primary endpoint of OS was not met; PFS and ORR were improved with manageable toxicity in the abemaciclib arm. The increases in response rates and PFS support further investigation of abemaciclib in other NSCLC subpopulations or in combination with other agents.

Abemaciclib is an oral, selective, and potent small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) being investigated for the treatment of patients with refractory hormone-receptor positive (HR+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The absolute bioavailability and effect of food on pharmacokinetics (PK) following a single 200-mg oral dose of abemaciclib in healthy subjects were evaluated in three studies (Table 1). Abemaciclib plasma concentrations were measured serially pre-dose through 192 hours post-dose. Non-compartmental analysis was used to calculate PK parameters, and a mixed-effects model was used for statistical inference. In Study 1 the absolute bioavailability of a 200-mg dose of abemaciclib was 45% (90% CI: 40%, 51%). In Study 2 the ratios of AUC0-? after a high-fat or standard meal compared to fasting showed no effect (90% CIs within 0.80, 1.25). However, Cmax increased by 24% and 25% following high-fat and standard meals, respectively, compared to fasting (upper 90% CIs &gt;1.25). No differences were found in the AUC0-? and Cmax of abemaciclib following a high-fat meal compared to a standard meal (90% CI within 0.80, 1.25). The median tmax was delayed by 2 hours following a high-fat meal compared to fasting (p = 0006). However, there was no difference in median tmax between the standard meal and fasting (p = .7197). Abemaciclib terminal half-life was similar across fed and fasted conditions. The late-breaking Study-3 results will be presented. In conclusion, abemaciclib oral bioavailability is sufficient to achieve therapeutic exposure. Food with abemaciclib does not reduce or increase the inter-individual PK variability and does not have a clinically-relevant impact on the PK of abemaciclib. Therefore, abemaciclib may be administered without regard to food. Table 1Designs for three open-label clinical studies of abemaciclib as a single 200-mg oral dose administered to healthy subjectsStudy ParametersNCT02327143a (Study 1)I3Y-MC-JPBSNCT02059148a (Study 2)I3Y-MC-JPBGNCT02482935a (Study 3)I3Y-MC-JPBUCompleted subjects (N)82329Overall designs and formulationsAbsolute bioavailability, 4 x 50-mg (25% w/w) capsules and tracer IVbPilot food effect, randomized crossover 3 period, 6 sequence 4 x 50-mg (50% w/w) capsulesPivotal food effect, randomized crossover 2 period, 2 sequence 2 x 100-mg (25% w/w) capsulesMeal conditionFastedFastedStandard mealHigh-fat, high-calorie mealFastedHigh-fat, high-calorie meal Citation Format: Kellie Turner, Jill Chappell, Palaniappan Kulanthaivel, Wee Teck Ng, Jane Royalty. Food effect on the pharmacokinetics of 200-mg abemaciclib in healthy subject. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT152.

SummaryBackground MET is a tyrosine kinase receptor involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and migration. Reported here are the phase I dose-escalation results for LY2875358, a monoclonal antibody against MET, in Japanese patients with advanced malignancies. Methods The study comprised a 3 + 3 dose-escalation part for LY2875358 monotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies (Part A) followed by an assessment of LY2875358 in combination with erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (Part B). LY2875358 was administered once every 2 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LY2875358; secondary objectives included evaluation of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity. Results Eleven patients received LY2875358 monotherapy at 3 dose levels (700 mg, N = 3; 1400 mg, N = 3; 2000 mg, N = 5) and 6 patients received LY2875358 2000 mg in combination with erlotinib (N = 3) or gefitinib (N = 3). No dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events related to LY2875358 were observed. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were hypoalbuminemia (2 patients) in Part A and dermatitis acneiform (4 patients) in Part B. LY2875358 area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) increased with dose over the dose range of 700 mg to 2000 mg. A best response of stable disease was achieved by 2/11 patients in Part A and 4/6 patients in Part B (disease control rate: 35 %). Conclusions LY2875358 at doses up to 2000 mg demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile as monotherapy or in combination with erlotinib or gefitinib in Japanese patients with advanced malignancies.