Photochemical reactions of ruthenium (II) complexes of type trans‐[Ru(NH3)4LL']2+, where L is a nitrogenous heterocyclic ligand, pyridine (py), isonicotinamide (isn), 4‐acetylpyridine (4‐acpy) or 4‐picoline (4‐pic), and L´ is a 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane (bpa) ligand, were studied with the purpose of evaluating the ligand exchange when, in solution, the complexes are irradiated at the wavelengths of 365, 436, 480 and 519 nm. The study revealed that at lower wavelengths, a labilization process is observed for py and 4‐pic ligands, even at low quantum yields, indicating the dependence of the photolabeling process on the wavelength. The study also reveals that for the filters of greater wavelength, the processes of photolabilization do not occur for any of the studied complexes. The study also shows that there are no photolization processes for the complexes obtained with the isn and 4‐acpy ligands, and it is therefore possible to classify them as nonreactive.

In this work, the use of computational methods was essential to distinguish the three possible isomeric structures of the [RuCl 3 (H 2 O) 2 (Gly)] molecule. The characterization of these molecules was performed using IR, NMR and UV-VIS simulations. Some calculations related to the optimization of structures and properties such as chemical hardness and dipole moment were also conducted. The fac-cis isomer presented promising data when compared to the experimental data, indicating that this is the likely experimentally synthesized isomer. This study demonstrates the technical utility of the computational calculations by virtue of situations that prevent the realization of X-ray diffraction.