OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to measure the appropriateness of vancomycin monitoring in a pediatric tertiary care center and to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions, autonomous pharmacy therapeutic drug monitoring and health care provider education, in reducing avoidable pediatric patient trauma and hospital cost. METHODS A retrospective chart review evaluating vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pediatric inpatients was performed before and after the introduction of an autonomous pharmacy TDM program and health care provider (HCP) education. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were included in our study, prior to any intervention. Of these, 9% of patients had trough concentrations appropriately deferred. Of the total of 64 trough concentrations obtained, 94% were considered to be inappropriate. After the start of the autonomous pharmacy TDM program, of the 54 eligible patients (111 troughs), 9% had trough concentrations appropriately deferred, and 34% were inappropriate. In the 3-month period following the introduction of HCP education in combination with pharmacy TDM, we identified 27 eligible patients. Among those, 15% of the patients had trough concentrations appropriately deferred. Of the 43 trough concentrations obtained, only 9% were considered to be inappropriate. The combination of pharmacy TDM with HCP education decreased annualized hospital cost by 60%, from $13,080 to $5232. CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate vancomycin TDM occurs commonly in our institution, resulting in unnecessary hospital cost and patient trauma. The combination of pharmacy TDM and HCP education significantly improved clinical practice; however, results were short-lived. Further interventions, such as computer based order entry, will likely be needed to reinforce and improve long-term TDM practice in pediatric patients.INDEX TERMS antibiotic stewardship, therapeutic drug monitoring, vancomycin J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2012;17(2):159-165

No abstract

A 32-year-old man developed rhabdomyolysis after ingesting double the recommended dosage of phentermine for a week in addition to engaging in strenuous activity.

Background: Dinutuximab, an immune-mediated therapy indicated for high-risk neuroblastoma, targets the protein disialoganglioside (GD2) on neuroblastoma cells, neurons, and peripheral nerve fibers. Off-target effects lead to severe nerve pain. Pain regimens including continuous infusion opioids are required during treatment courses.Our institution utilizes a combination of intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine infusions and morphine for the treatment of dinutuximab-associated neuropathic pain. Objective:The primary outcome of this study was to compare morphine equivalents for cycle 1 of dinutuximab at an institution that uses i.v. lidocaine (primary) versus those that do not (comparison). Secondary outcomes included both dinutuximab infusion time and safety of i.v. lidocaine. Methods:A retrospective, multicentered, electronic chart review was performed at three tertiary academic medical centers. Patients between 0 and 18 years of age during their first course of dinutuximab were included to evaluate the primary outcome of adjuvant morphine equivalents needed.Results: Twenty-one patients were identified for inclusion. Total morphine equivalents at the primary institution were 1.87 mg/kg versus 1.79 mg/kg at the comparison institutions (P = 0.413). Dinutuximab infusion time was statistically significantly less at the primary institution: 610.5 minutes versus 676.23 minutes (P = 0.046). Only one patient at the primary institution experienced nausea, vomiting, and paresthesias.Conclusions: This study did not find a statistically significant difference in morphine equivalents between patients receiving i.v. lidocaine and those who did not. Lidocaine use resulted in a statistically significant lower dinutuximab infusion time. Our data suggest it is a safe adjuvant medication, for use outside of the pediatric intensive care unit, in the treatment of dinutuximab-associated neuropathic pain.