Managed care payers, pharmacy directors, pharmacy benefit managers, specialty pharmacy directors, oncology pharmacists, and any other pharmacist and/or healthcare professional interested in scientific advances for combination therapies in the treatment of non−small cell lung cancer. Activity OverviewWhile cancer treatment makes strides in improvement, lung cancer persists as a leading cause of death and cases remain high, reaching over 228,000 new cases and over 135,000 deaths in 2020. One of the major developments in the treatment paradigm of non−small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). As evidence for use of ICIs in the frontline setting increases, the impact of potential toxicities, utilization of resources, and cost becomes more relevant for managed care providers. ICIs have the potential to minimize adverse effects and decrease overall cost compared with chemotherapy. Managed care professionals and pharmacists require a foundational knowledge of appropriate usage and selection of ICIs within treatment regimens for patients with NSCLC. Familiarity with currently available and emerging ICIs for treatment of NSCLC will lead to improved outcomes across patient populations. This activity will also cover biomarker analysis for candidacy of treatment with ICIs, strategies and guidelines of ICI treatment, and impact of ICI therapy on patients' quality of life.

210 Background: The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor cancer treatment tolerability has been shown to positively impact outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence and severity of side effects, patient self-management confidence, and medication adherence in patients receiving oral oncolytic therapy. Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted across 6 Michigan oncology practices from July 2016-December 2018. Patients were eligible to complete PROMs during the course of their treatment if they were receiving an oral oncolytic medication (excluding endocrine therapy). Results: There were a total of 2252 PROMs completed in 695 patients. Patients were 48% female, a median age of 69 years, and most commonly receiving treatment with capecitabine (18%), palbociclib (10%), and lenalidomide (9%). 54% of PROMs had at least one Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) symptom rated as moderate or severe. Patients indicated the presence of a most bothersome symptom (MBS) in 35% of PROMs. Most common MBSs were fatigue (26%), pain (16%), constitutional symptoms other than fatigue (15%), and nausea/vomiting (14%). Non-adherence was reported in 20% of PROMs. ESAS symptoms rated as moderate or severe, the presence of a MBS, and lower confidence scores all correlated with medication non-adherence. Conclusions: Patients taking oral oncolytics for their cancer treatment experience a high symptom burden with more than 50% experiencing a moderate to severe symptom. Optimizing symptom management and providing patient education that increases patient confidence in self-management may improve medication adherence and patient outcomes.

No abstract

8 Background: The overuse of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RAs) is a focus of quality measurement within the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (ASCO-QOPI) and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) as a Choosing Wisely measure. The Michigan Oncology Quality Collaborative (MOQC) is a statewide collaborative with participation of nearly 100% of oncologists. The purpose of this project was to provide quality improvement practice support for deimplementation of NK1-RAs in the upfront prevention of chemotherapy- induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for low and moderate emetic chemotherapy regimens (QOPI measure SMT28a) to less than 30% in practices across the State, with lower scores indicating better performance. Methods: In 2018, MOQC added the QOPI SMT28a measure as part of its standard quality measure module for collection by all MOQC practices. A quality improvement intervention was initiated that consisted of 1) baseline assessments of measure performance, prescriber knowledge and beliefs, and pre-populated antiemetic order sets, 2) reporting practice and state-level performance to MOQC practices, 3) state-wide CINV education, and 4) a value-based reimbursement (VBR) related to measure performance. Post-intervention performance was assessed with the Fall 2019 and Spring 2020 QOPI-measurement. Results: Responses from a survey assessing pre-populated antiemetic order sets (32/43, 74% response rate), 23% of practices had a pre-populated order set for NK1-RA and/or olanzapine in moderate emetic regimens. The post-education order set survey found that 48% of respondents (25/43, 54% response rate) either modified or were in the process of modifying their order sets. Conclusions: Deimplementation of unnecessary and low value antiemetics in patients receiving low- or moderate emetic chemotherapy was possible via a state-wide quality improvement program that involved performance reporting to practices, collaborative-wide education, modification of standing order sets, and VBR based on performance. [Table: see text]