1578 Background: Barriers to population screening for BRCA mutations include access, availability of counseling, and readiness of care providers to participate in this process. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study evaluates a digital approach to genetic testing of a defined population using a medical model and risk-adapted follow-up. Methods: The BFOR study (Bforstudy.com) includes web-based enrollment open to individuals in four US cities who are age 25 or older and have at least one grandparent of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry. Participants receive web-based education, provide consent, complete questionnaires, and note their preference for receiving results either from their primary care provider (PCP) or BFOR staff. BRCA AJ founder mutation results are disclosed by (e)mail or phone, depending on need for additional counseling/genetic testing. Participants will be surveyed by email for up to 5 years; a subset of PCPs is also being surveyed. Results: From March 2018 to January 2019, 2562 participants enrolled: 78% female; < 30 years old, 8%; 30-50 years, 39%; > 50 years, 53%. At enrollment, 33% requested disclosure of results by PCP. Among 847 PCPs invited to disclose results, 45% accepted, 50% declined and 5% have yet to respond. 69 (3.2%) participants tested positive for a BRCA founder mutation, of whom 8 (12%) had no significant family history. 2087 participants tested negative, of whom 6% reported a known family mutation, 38% reported a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and 56% no such history. The most common reason for study participation was referral by a friend. One individual with a distant history of breast cancer tested positive for a BRCA2 mutation and underwent risk reducing surgery that identified an early stage fallopian tube carcinoma. Her daughter then tested positive and underwent prophylactic surgeries. Conclusions: Population screening of individuals at higher risk for cancer-predisposing mutations is feasible and identifies individuals who would not have been tested using clinical criteria. Preliminary findings reveal challenges for engaging PCPs and at-risk individuals, particularly men. Ongoing follow-up and a second phase of the study will address these barriers to testing. Clinical trial information: NCT03351803.

Background: Evidence is needed regarding effective incentive strategies to increase clinician survey response rates. Cash cards are increasingly used as survey incentives; they are appealing because of their convenience and because in some cases their value can be reclaimed by investigators if not used. However, their effectiveness in clinician surveys is not known. In this study within the BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study, a clinical trial of populationbased BRCA1/2 mutation screening, we compared the use of upfront cash cards requiring email activation versus checks as clinician survey incentives. Methods: Participants receiving BRCA1/2 testing in the BFOR study could elect to receive their results from their primary care provider (PCP, named by the patient) or from a geneticist associated with the study. In order to understand PCPs' knowledge, attitudes, experiences and willingness to disclose results we mailed paper surveys to the first 501 primary care providers (PCPs) in New York, Boston, Los Angeles and Philadelphia who were nominated by study participants to disclose their BRCA1/2 mutation results obtained through the study. We used alternating assignment stratified by city to assign the first 303 clinicians to receive a $50 up-front incentive as a cash card (N = 155) or check (N = 148). The cash card required PCPs to send an activation email in order to be used. We compared response rates by incentive type, adjusting for PCP characteristics and study site. Results: In unadjusted analyses, PCPs who received checks were more likely to respond to the survey than those who received cash cards (54.1% versus 41.9%, p = 0.046); this remained true when we adjusted for provider characteristics (OR for checks 1.61, 95% CI 1.01, 2.59). No other clinician characteristics had a statistically significant association with response rates in adjusted analyses. When we included an interaction term for incentive type and city, the favorable impact of checks on response rates was evident only in Los Angeles and Philadelphia. Conclusions: An up-front cash card incentive requiring email activation may be less effective in eliciting clinician responses than up-front checks. However, the benefit of checks for clinician response rates may depend on clinicians' geographic location. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03351803), November 24, 2017.

No abstract

2007 Background: NCCN now endorses BRCA founder mutation genetic testing (GT) via longitudinal studies in all Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study offers pre-GT online education with posttest engagement of primary care providers (PCPs). Methods: The study in 4 US cities enrolls those age > 25 with > 1 AJ grandparent. Participants enroll online with chatbot and video education, have GT at local centers, receive results from their PCP or BFOR staff, and are surveyed 12 weeks post disclosure and annually for 5 years. Univariate analyses and multivariable (MV) logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with not completing GT, selecting PCP to disclose GT, and positive GT. Results: As of January 2020, 4754 participants consented (77.5% female, median age 51); 37.7% never previously considered GT. Cancer family histories (FHx) were 56.4% low risk (LR), 36.4% high risk (HR), and 7.2% had a familial mutation (FM). To date, 3658 participants (76.9%) completed and 677 (14.2%) did not complete GT; the remainder are pending. Only 34.8% of participants selected PCP to disclose GT, and 42.6% of PCPs agreed. Of the 124 mutation carriers (3.4%) identified, 60.5% had a FM. At the 12-week survey, 65.4% of mutation carriers planned to proceed with recommended screening or scheduled risk reducing surgery; 3.5% of those with negative GT and HR FHx reported further GT. Satisfaction was high (mean 9.58/10, SD 1.12) and unrelated to result (p>.05). Conclusions: A digital model for founder mutation testing engaged those with LR FHx and no prior experience with GT. Older participants were more likely to complete the study. Males were less likely to enroll but more likely to carry mutations. The majority of those who tested positive had a FM. A minority of results were disclosed by PCPs. Continued follow up is needed to determine long term outcomes. [Table: see text]

Background This project aimed to optimize communication strategies to support family communication about familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and improve cascade testing uptake among at-risk relatives. Individuals and families with FH provided feedback on multiple strategies including: a family letter, digital tools, and direct contact. Methods Feedback from participants was collected via dyadic interviews (n = 11) and surveys (n = 98) on communication strategies and their proposed implementation to improve cascade testing uptake. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify how to optimize each strategy. We categorized optimizations and their implementation within the project’s healthcare system using a Traffic Light approach. Results Thematic analysis resulted in four distinct suggested optimizations for each communication strategy and seven suggested optimizations that were suitable across all strategies. Four suggestions for developing a comprehensive cascade testing program, which would offer all optimized communication strategies also emerged. All optimized suggestions coded green (n = 21) were incorporated. Suggestions coded yellow (n = 12) were partially incorporated. Only two suggestions were coded red and could not be incorporated. Conclusions This project demonstrates how to collect and analyze stakeholder feedback for program design. We identified feasible suggested optimizations, resulting in communication strategies that are patient-informed and patient-centered. Optimized strategies were implemented in a comprehensive cascade testing program.