Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome (PMS). This is the first trial of a unique oral contraceptive containing a combination of drospirenone (DRSP, 3 mg) and ethinyl estradiol (EE, 30 microg) for the treatment of PMDD. DRSP is a spironolactone-like progestin with antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid activity. Spironolactone has been shown to be beneficial in PMS, whereas oral contraceptives have shown conflicting results. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 82 women with PMDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. [DSM IV]) were randomized to receive DRSP/EE or placebo for three treatment cycles. The primary end point was change from baseline in luteal phase symptom scores as assessed on the Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences (COPE) scale. Patients treated with DRSP/EE showed a numerically greater change from baseline compared with those treated with placebo on each of the 22 COPE items and each of the 4 symptom factors. Between-group differences in symptom improvement reached statistical significance in factor 3 only (appetite, acne, and food cravings, p = 0.027). The secondary end points, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Profile of Mood States (PMS), were consistent with the primary end point in that patients treated with the oral contraceptive showed a numerically greater improvement from baseline compared with those treated with placebo. The results of this study show a consistent trend in the reduction of symptoms that suggested a beneficial effect of DRSP/EE for the treatment of PMDD, despite limitations of the study design.

No abstract

The Trauma Questionnaire (TQ) assesses a woman's history of childhood and adult sexual trauma, sexual harassment, and domestic violence. The TQ is used widely at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, but its validity has not been thoroughly examined. In a prospective study of 127 women, we found the TQ to have good to excellent agreement with a semistructured clinician interview and good sensitivity and specificity. The TQ can be used as a valid alternative to the clinician interview in the initial elicitation of trauma history among women veterans in the primary care setting.

Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum has been reported to be an uncommon respiratory pathogen. We describe the clinical and microbiologic features of 17 patients from whose sputum C. pseudodiphtheriticum was isolated. Patients were identified through a review of the reports from the clinical microbiology laboratory at York Hospital, a community teaching hospital, from October 1990 through April 1993; 17 patients with respiratory infection caused by C. pseudodiphthriticum were identified. There were 12 cases of bronchitis and five of pneumonia. An underlying systemic condition, particularly congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, or malignancy, was common. Onset of symptomatology was acute for most patients, but fever was noticeably absent in almost two-thirds of the cases. Isolates were uniformly susceptible to the beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, but resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin was common. The isolation of diphtheroids from a properly obtained sputum sample from a patient with respiratory tract infection should not always be dismissed as due to contamination. The isolation, identification, and susceptibility testing of C. pseudodiphtheriticum from respiratory tract specimens may provide information useful for treatment of patients.

The recovery of pathogens and the speed of their detection were determined for our conventional blood culture system (an Isolator [Wampole] and a 100-ml Thiol bottle [Difco]) compared with automated ESP aerobic and anaerobic bottles (80 ml each; Difco). Each of the four culture devices was inoculated with approximately 10 ml of blood from symptomatic patients weighing more than 80 lb (ca. 36 kg). From 7,070 sets of cultures for 2,841 patients, 607 clinically significant isolates were recovered: 456 (75.1%) from the Isolator, 353 (58.2%) from Thiol, 377 (62.1%) from ESP aerobic bottles, and 346 (57.0%) from ESP anaerobic bottles. Of the 607 isolates, 149 (24.5%) were detected only with the conventional system (Isolator and/or Thiol), and 65 (10.7%) were detected only with the ESP two-bottle system (P < 0.001). Our conventional system allowed for detection of significantly more isolates of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.001), Staphylococcus aureus (P < 0.01), Staphylococcus spp. (coagulase-negative) (P < 0.01), and Enterococcus spp. (P < 0.05), and ESP facilitated detection of significantly more isolates of S. pneumoniae (P < 0.01). When all four devices in a culture set were positive for the same isolate, no microbial species or group was detected significantly earlier (.24 h) by either blood culture system. The Isolator contamination rate (4.8%) was .6 times the rate for any of the bottles. Of pathogens detected by the Isolator, 50% were recovered in counts of '1.0 CFU/ml and 18% were recovered only as a single colony. The ESP system offered an automated, less labor-intensive blood culture system for which routine subcultures were not required, but the important considerations of culturing large volumes of blood and of obtaining at least two sets from each patient in our population were reemphasized.