ObjectivesFall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety) is an evidence-based fall prevention program that led to a 25% reduction in falls in hospitalized adults. Because it would be helpful to assess nurses’ perceptions of burdens imposed on them by using Fall TIPS or other fall prevention program, we conducted a study to learn benefits and burdens.MethodsA 3-phase mixed-method study was conducted at 3 hospitals in Massachusetts and 3 in New York: (1) initial qualitative, elicited and categorized nurses’ views of time spent implementing Fall TIPS; (2) second qualitative, used nurses’ quotes to develop items, research team inputs for refinement and organization, and clinical nurses’ evaluation and suggestions to develop the prototype scale; and (3) quantitative, evaluated psychometric properties.ResultsFour “time” themes emerged: (1) efficiency, (2) inefficiency, (3) balances out, and (4) valued. A 20-item prototype Fall Prevention Efficiency Scale was developed, administered to 383 clinical nurses, and reduced to 13 items. Individual items demonstrated robust stability with Pearson correlations of 0.349 to 0.550 and paired t tests of 0.155 to 1.636. Four factors explained 74.3% variance and provided empirical support for the scale’s conceptual basis. The scale achieved excellent internal consistency values (0.82–0.92) when examined with the test, validation, and paired (both test and retest) samplesConclusionsThis new scale assess nurses’ perceptions of how a fall prevention program affects their efficiency, which impacts the likelihood of use. Learning nurses’ beliefs about time wasted when implementing new programs allows hospitals to correct problems that squander time.

The objective of the study is to educate New York City seniors aged 60 years and older about fire safety and burn prevention through the use of a community-based, culturally sensitive delivery platform. The ultimate goal is to reduce burn injury morbidity and mortality among this at-risk population. Programming was developed and provided to older adults attending community-based senior centers. Topics included etiology of injury, factors contributing to burn injuries, methods of prevention, emergency preparedness, and home safety. Attendees completed a postpresentation survey. Of the 234 senior centers invited to participate in the program, 64 (27%) centers requested presentations, and all received the educational programming, reaching 2196 seniors. An additional 2590 seniors received education during community-based health fairs. A majority reported learning new information, found the presentation helpful, and intended to apply this knowledge to daily routines. Data confirm that many opportunities exist to deliver culturally sensitive burn prevention programming to the older adult population of this large metropolitan area in settings that are part of their daily lives. A majority of respondents welcomed the information, perceived it as helpful, and reported that they were likely to integrate the information into their lives.

The pediatric early warning score (PEWS) tool helps providers to detect subtle clinical deterioration in non-intensive care unit pediatric patients and intervene early to prevent significant adverse outcomes. Although widely used in general pediatrics, limited studies report on its validation; none report on use with burn-injured patients. New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center modified a general PEWS system to a burn-specific PEWS and integrated its use into standard practice. This study investigated the external validity of the PEWS process in clinical practice. Fifty cases of patients aged 0 to 15.9 years admitted between January 2012 and June 2013, whose length of stay (LOS) more than 3 days were selected for review from this cohort of n equal to 187. Demographics, total PEWS and score changes, and compliance with PEWS documentation and with resultant interventions were reviewed. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD, P less than 0.05. Mean age, burn size, and LOS were 3.2 ± 3.3 years, 4.8 ± 5.7%, and 9.8 ± 7.0 days; 26% required grafting, and 50% were male. No mortalities occurred. One thousand six hundred and twelve PEWS from 1745 opportunities were documented (92.4%). For all PEWS (n = 1612) and PEWS greater than 0 (n = 912), means were 0.9 ± 1.2 and 1.6 ± 1.2, respectively. Among the 162 PEWS increase events, intake (54.1%) and output (4.5%) parameters increased most commonly. Of these, 129 PEWS increases (79.6%) were followed by an intervention that most commonly included text notation of score increase (93.7%), physician/physician assistant notification (70.5%), and feeding-tube insertion (25.6%). Patients with PEWS greater than 0 had similar age, LOS, and larger burn size (5.2% vs 1.4%, P < 0.05) than those with PEWS equal to 0. Compliance with PEWS performance and resultant actions based on score increases are high. Data support that even small changes in burn-injury specific PEWS stimulate provider discussion and intervention and support its validation; further studies on its effect on practice are warranted.